isn't github scaling pretty embarrassingly parallel tho? doesn't "ready to scale" at any "good" tech company mean "we can handle 10x without architectural changes?"

that's the mentality i was taught at faang

yeah i think Claude might just be compounding its way to a local maximum rn

maybe they meant typing? lol

That's the most reasonable read of "coding" as opposed to the overall discipline of software development/"engineering", yeah.

use git prole

i still do :)

Right, instead of having 20+ tmux panes with docs, specs and whatever, I just have 20+ tmux panes with various Codex sessions for various purposes instead, some of them been idling for days now, waiting for me to come back.

Things just moved up on the abstraction-ladder, but it's still there, hidden beneath all the TUI sessions instead.

1.2% of positives were false, right? Not 1.2% of the entire dataset.

So it would be 1.2% of that 35% positive subset. So 34.65%.

No. Of pages written before GPT, so 100% of pages were not written by GPT, the detector said that 1.2% of them were written by GPT. So 100% innocent pages, but 1.2% marked as guilty. But of the 1.2% marked, 100% of them were false positives.

But my calculation was wrong too. What I should have said is, 65% were non-GPT pages, but 1.2% of those were getting flagged, or 0.78%. So 34.3% were actually written by GPT, to first order.

he is insufferable. it's his thing lol.

> No. What else could it reasonably be named? Hard to imagine.

Ocaml often just has it be T

so uuid.T

I spend 45 minutes writing it. then i git commit and move on cuz i made something good.

who is winning here? lol