First- and second-level American History. Each class succeeding year, I suspect, some of the students took the course just to sit in on the fallacies section. We used David Hackett Fischer's Historian's Fallacies and Copi's text to narrow some of the fallacies more precisely to history throughout the history course.
Personally, I enjoy detail-oriented activies, so software suits me just fine. But if I was going to switch to something else, I'd ask myself "What other detail-oriented industries could I thrive in?"
* Restaurant / hotel management (specifically, the atmosphere and ambience of a space)
Why not just "So, how long have you been programming for?"
I'd interpret this question as "Does this person think I'm experienced enough for the work?" over explicitly wanting to know whether I began at a young age.
"What do you call the number of times that one number can be divided by another?" A) Dividend, B) Divisor, C) Quotient.
And a minor UX nitpick: please wrap the input element inside of a <label> tag, it makes it much easier to interact with form elements (in that I can click on the text to mark the element):
The correct answer to that question would be the Logarithm. 32 can be divided 5 times by 2 before it becomes 1 and you can't divided it anymore. I think the phrasing of the question is incorrect.
That's the only question I got wrong because it did not make any sense to me.
I have one suggestion. The dialog at the end like "you got the following questions wrong: 23" can be easily mistaken for the number of questions answered wrong. I did!
If that be changed to avoid the confusion, it will be great.
One colloquial term for the guillotine was (is?) "le rasoir national" = "the national razor."
Other colorful terms include "the regretful climb", "the silence mill", "Capet's necktie", "the patriotic shortener", "half-moon", "timbers of justice", and "Charlot's rocking-chair".
Point noted, will rework those aspects. To note: I am Afghan myself, but I do see how that line particular could be a pain point. And yes was meant to be sarcastic. Thank you.
OK, I didn't mean to sound harsh, that statement just seemed out of place.
Taking another look at this, here's what I see:
> As AI capability continues to advance, it'll consistently and increasingly outperform traditional human analysis in both speed and accuracy.
> Our Orchid hybrid model combines neural networks, quantitative models, and language models to leverage both numerical and textual information, enabling smarter, faster algorithmic decision-making with significantly less human supervision.
> Here's a couple use cases: ...
> Simulating the past twelve months, our implementation of Orchid outperformed the S&P 500 by over 10%.
These four statements tell me the problem/opportunity, your solution to that opportunity, how that solution might be relevant / useful to me, and proof that your solution works.
This is your value proposition, and what I need to know about Orchid as a potential customer / user. I'd consolidate these four statements and put them at the top of the page. The jokes can come later (but I'd still tone down the sarcasm).
If your country allows it, why not consider both? Or a major in CS with a minor in Business Administration/Finance?
> ...a CS degree...will probably lose value.
I wouldn't bet on that. Computers aren't going anywhere, and just in the past 15 years, we've seen entire industries created around smartphones, cloud computing, streaming, VR, IoT, SaaS, and AI. Pick which wave you want to surf! A technical and/or a business background would be useful here.
> I'm not confident that 4 years from now the field will be what it is now.
That I would bet on.
And by the way, just because you major (or don't major) in something doesn't mean you've locked yourself into (or out of) that activity. When I switched from music performance to computer science, I had the feeling that I had turned my back on my music, that I couldn't now excel in it...which was nonsense! It wasn't until I realized, that just because I don't major in something doesn't mean I still can't do that thing well, was I able to embrace the decision to choose CS.
The application to real life is the most important step, I think. I guess that makes me a pragmatist.