Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | throw0101a's commentslogin

> He can blow his money on 1 million satellites that will all decay back into the atmosphere within a few years

He can also 'blow' his money on helping people by giving them opportunities:

> In 1993, Harris Rosen “adopted” a run-down, drug-infested section of Orlando called Tangelo Park. Rosen offers free preschool for all children prior to kindergarten and a free college education for high school graduates. Today, the high school graduation rate for Tangelo Park is 100 percent. And no, that is not a typo.

* https://www.ucf.edu/pegasus/harris-rosen/

* https://www.today.com/news/millionaire-uses-fortune-help-kid...


Helping people with ALS speak again seems worthy, as does helping humanity become a multi planetary species.

Is throwing up "1 million satellites" going to do those things?

How about running DOGE and gutting USAID?

Or helping Trump get elected? Was that a worthy endeavour? How's that working out for the average American (or anyone else on the planet) with four dollar gas and five dollar diesel?


Bringing satellite coverage to the world, including Iran and Ukraine is noble, yes.

As is volunteering to help get rid of waste and fraud, particularly when his time could be spent on more lucrative pursuits.

There are more things to life than the price of gas.


> Bringing satellite coverage to world, including Iran and Ukraine is noble, yes.

Are we including cutting off Ukraine’s coverage at keys times? Or Russian usage?

No need to discuss the DOGE bit, no one believes that trillion dollar saving was real.

‘Musk the Noble’ sure has a smell to it.


> cutting off Ukraine’s coverage at keys times?

The only 'key times' were Ukrainian military usage of Starlink inside Russia. Ukraine was given Starlink to use to defend Ukraine, not attack Russia.

> Or Russian usage?

Which was explicitly identified and cut off.

> No need to discuss the DOGE bit

Exactly. Nobody can defend fraud and abuse. Since your main issue is that the savings weren't as big as expected it sounds like you know that.


> The only 'key times' were Ukrainian military usage of Starlink inside Russia. Ukraine was given Starlink to use to defend Ukraine, not attack Russia.

Fighting without hurting the enemy? What’s the point? The approach of the Trump administration is just letting Ukraine bleed out.

Russian starlink usage has only just been cut off, how many years did that take?

> Nobody can defend fraud and abuse

This administration is anti-fraud and anti-abuse?


> Fighting without hurting the enemy?

No. Nobody said that except you.

> What’s the point?

Getting Russia out of the Ukraine.

> Russian starlink usage has only just been cut off

No. Russians have tried to use Starlink in late 2023 early 2024, there were no direct or indirect sales and terminals were disabled on a blacklist basis. They moved from a blacklist to a whitelist in February this year.

> This administration is anti-fraud and anti-abuse

In some ways, yes. I won't defend "Trump coin" but it's pretty clear with things like USAID, Minnesota child care center scams, and the California hospice scam the democrats were in favour of and participated in fraud and abuse.


> the Ukraine.

Correcting self: Ukraine.


> Bringing satellite coverage to the world, including Iran and Ukraine is noble, yes.

The general "world" is getting connectivity just fine via mobile phones for a lot less than what it would cost them to get a Starlink system.

Useful for the war in Ukraine, not so useful in Iran:

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Internet_blackout_in_Iran...

> As is volunteering to help get rid of waste and fraud, particularly when his time could be spent on more lucrative pursuits.

When did he do this? Are you referring to (LOL) DOGE? Nothing like raising unemployment without saving any money:

* https://www.cato.org/blog/doge-produced-largest-peacetime-wo...

* https://fordschool.umich.edu/news/2025/reality-doges-mediocr...

And let's not start on all the illegal actions:

* https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/feb/10/elon-musk-do...

Those (supposed) efficiency cuts in (e.g.) USAID have been estimated to have caused many tens of thousands of deaths:

* https://www.thelancet.com/article/S0140-6736(25)01186-9/full...

* https://hsph.harvard.edu/news/usaid-shutdown-has-led-to-hund...

And how much of the (alleged) money that was saved is now going towards the Iran war? The Pentagon is asking for $200B:

* https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2026/3/25/c...

> There are more things to life than the price of gas.

That is a very privileged view. In the US specifically, with its abysmal public transportation due to car-centric {ex,sub}urban design, a lot of people will need to pay more for getting to work and will have to cut back on (e.g.) groceries.

Globally, oil prices are wreaking havoc in all sorts of ways on daily life:

> Worsening fuel shortages resulting from the war in the Middle East are threatening sacred funeral ceremonies in Thailand, where Buddhist temples are scrambling to obtain diesel for cremations.

> The abbot of Wat Saman Rattanaram in Chachoengsao province, about 80km (50 miles) east of Bangkok, warned that a suspension of cremation services was a real possibility. Some petrol stations have run out of fuel, while others allow sales only to vehicle operators.

* https://www.scmp.com/news/asia/southeast-asia/article/334692...


> Useful for the war in Ukraine, not so useful in Iran

Wikipedia isn't a source, but regardless Wikipedia confirms the utility of Starlink in the war.

> Are you referring to DOGE

Yes.

> without saving any money

Your source at Cato Institute confirm 150B.

> USAID have been estimated to have caused many tens of thousands of deaths

Lancet is a political advocacy magazine. USAID isn' an AID agency. Not funding gay and lesbian theatre in Serbia doesn't stop anyone from dying.

> much of the (alleged) money that was saved

You said zero money was saved earlier. What is it?

> is now going towards the Iran war?

It seems like a better investment than giving Iran 1.6 billion dollars to fund terrorism across the middle east, wouldn't you say?


> The problem is... what if I want to make ice cream?

The extreme form of this causes:

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoarding#Anxiety

For ice cream specifically, America's Test Kitchen has you covered with "How to Make Homemade Ice Cream Without A Machine":

* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=72Ml3U39xqs

And their video on some of the science behind making good ice cream:

* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=St-8kZ7vmfI


And in my case, if I actually had a summer BBQ which I probably will this summer I’ll drive 5 minutes to the local excellent ice cream stand and pick some up. Fun activity for kids though.

> usb-c

Don't forget about the time micro-USB has mandated. Was that "competent government"?


That government has a limited jurisdiction over the offenders. They were still effective to the point, that there was only a single company not having microUSB. Granted that wasn't a small part of the market, but also not the largest.

> Unfortunately few people know without the Muslim Scholars after the fall of Rome, little of the ancient texts would have survived.

Did not Muslim Scholars originally get the texts from Nestorian and Syriac Christians in the Middle East? Wouldn't there be a good chance of the text surviving in their monasteries?


Software patents suck. :/

Yeah I'm curious to see how this turns out, because I think part of the appeal of AV1 was how it's unencumbered by them

Yup software patents are terribly bad, we need to abolish them https://endsoftwarepatents.org/

One tool that can be used in a deployment hook which supports the API of several dozen DNS providers:

* https://github.com/dns-lexicon/dns-lexicon


The list of API integrations provided by the lego project looks quite impressive. https://go-acme.github.io/lego/dns/index.html

There's at least one ACME client that has this as an explicit feature:

> Get certificates for remote servers - The tokens used to provide validation of domain ownership, and the certificates themselves can be automatically copied to remote servers (via ssh, sftp or ftp for tokens). The script doesn't need to run on the server itself. This can be useful if you don't have access to run such scripts on the server itself, e.g. if it's a shared server.

* https://github.com/srvrco/getssl

It's written in Bash, so dependencies aren't too heavy.


> I've been hesitant to set that up because I'm concerned about the potential compromise of a token that has permissions to edit my DNS zone.

Depending on your DNS provider, it may be possible to narrow the permissions to allow only updates of a particular record. Route53 as an example:

      {
         "Effect": "Allow",
         "Action": "route53:ChangeResourceRecordSets",
         "Resource": "arn:aws:route53:::hostedzone/<ZONE-ID>",
         "Condition": {
            "ForAllValues:StringEquals": {
               "route53:ChangeResourceRecordSetsNormalizedRecordNames": "_acme-challenge.<SUB>.<DOMAIN>.<TLD>"
            }
         }
      }
* https://github.com/acmesh-official/acme.sh/wiki/How-to-use-A...

BIND 9 example:

* https://dan.langille.org/2020/12/19/creating-a-very-specific...

You can also point the hostname that you wish to issues certs for to another (sub-)domain completely via a CNAME, and allow updates only for that other (sub-)domain:

* https://github.com/acmesh-official/acme.sh/wiki/DNS-alias-mo...

* https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/02/technical-deep-dive-se...


Yes, I see that AWS Route53 can limit credential scope. That kind of thing helps a lot.

I've never heard of that CNAME approach for changing the validation domain. That looks like a viable solution since it requires a one-time setup on the main domain and ongoing access to the second (validation) domain.


> That looks like a viable solution since it requires a one-time setup on the main domain and ongoing access to the second (validation) domain.

At my last job we deployed a special sub-domain for that purpose (dnsauth.example.com) and manually created CNAMEs on our main (sub-)domains to point to it.

We then deployed a single (no-HA) externally exposed BIND server with a bunch of scripts that folks could connect to (we had deploy hooks scripts for users/developrs). Nowadays there even purpose-build DNS servers for this purpose:

* https://github.com/acme-dns/acme-dns


My experience has been that CertBot doesn't play well with CNAME delegation, but it's probably very situational, like depending upon which DNS hosting provider plugin you're using.

My solution was to give up on CertBot and use dehydrated instead. This did require me to come up with a script to make the necessary API call to the DNS hosting, which dehydrated will then run as necessary.


> My experience has been that CertBot doesn't play well with CNAME delegation […]

A CertBot ticket on the subject opened January 2026:

* https://github.com/certbot/certbot/issues/10555


> English on the other hand has so many exceptions (usually based on the origin of the word), that I still encounter words that I'll mispronounce at first.

English is not really one language in a sense given that it uses words from some many others. Anglo-Saxon, French, Latin, Greek, etc.



Also used in Italian and presumably in many other languages.

Like with any word, it's use in colloquial form may vary from generation to generation, from subculture to subculture etc


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: