But RA already eats up huge amount if storage when working in a large project, if you're using disk cache, it'll gobble up more, That's the biggest complain I had with RA. Somehow never had this issue with jetbrains rust plugin.
I’m not sure if RA intentionally uses storage space itself.
It can use storage when running build scripts/expanding proc macros, or when running flycheck diagnostics. In both cases, it’s because it runs cargo and it writes artifacts to the target dir. And if features do not align between “common” cargo commands and configuration rust analyzer has, it can lead to conflicts and even more increased storage size (because you end up having effectively 2 sets of artifacts).
But all of that does not apply to rust glances, since it does not build code for you (even cargo diagnostics are disabled by default).
Rust Glancer analysis artifacts are not that big (it’s basically stuff that would otherwise be loaded to memory), and Rust Glancer cleans garbage so that it does not accumulate over time, so it should be fine.
LLM doesn't need soft skills, but just knowing how to write a prompt to get the correct percentage values in a RAG and get the result close to your expectations out. Well it might be different based on the training data, which ai company, and how much you're paying.
People are different, they will be sometime affected by their emotional situation, surrounding, no matter how much they're being paid, You need to understand their mental situation, did he got scolded by the upper management today? He might not be on his best of his capacity right now. Or they might've pulled an all nighter and really not in their best position.
If someone going to treat people like an LLM, definitely is not going to have good time
Ironically, the same applies to AI. We seem to get demonstrably better results when speaking to models encouragingly [1]. It's a lot easier to re-establish goodwill when you can clear the memory and context of a program vs. a human though.
We don't know if it's all marketing stunts, or real, do we now?
> It's a lot easier to re-establish goodwill when you can clear the memory and context of a program vs. a human though.
That's the point. You can't erase human memories, experiences, (unless you bonk their head hard enough according to movies in my subcontinent, another bonk might reverse too) which will definitely affect their decisions and results.
Having a Garmin, ruined me with awesome battery life, but after I melted it, I was using Amazfit ActiveEdge (can't find straps, the watch is still ok), which made me realize, I'm fine with it, both serves what I need, with over week of battery life. And, that matters the most at the end. Having ADHD, a smart watch is a life saver. But charging it everyday? Nope, who have time for that!?
Alarms are crucial, I have 8 alarms set, just to remind me of passing time.
Calendar is also very useful, for quick glance, externalizing of information is really important when you have a bad memory
Sleep tracking, at least I know how long I might have slept. Surprisingly, Amazfit detects going to sleep very consistently and reliably then Garmin (not counting, sleep level detection accuracy) which did surprise me a lot
Activity reminder, it reminds me I'm sitting for too long, and have a goal set. Which is really useful for me.
Steps, weather, notifications all are pretty important, to keep me off mobile. If I open the mobile, it's given I'll lose focus and lose a large chunk of time.
Well, from an ADHD book, do not remember the exact statement but goes like this, "But doctor, how do I remember to take the medicine that is supposed to help me remember things"
If I have to charge it every day, it will create another thing that I will forget to do, and make it ultimately useless for me.
And once you get used to 10-15 days of battery life, charging your watch every day feels absolutely absurd.
Yeah! This point jumped at me. And, immediately I don't trust this.
This sounds same as Google's "don't be evil" enshiftification, consolidating technologies that was available in a competitive way.
I prefer Scientists, and team of people working on things, instead of a corporate controlling everything with promise of automation, thank you very much.
Are these theoretical spherical scientists that work in free range habitats just doing science and nibbling on carrots? The telephone came out of a corporation's research lab and there was a lot of money and profit motive involved.
i didn't even realized they are dead, was looking for a cheap one for running my calendar server and couldn't find a single one. I had one it was really handy
Yeah, too many lead batteries here, and there are a lot of battery recycle factories. It's been a health and environment concern for a while. And these batteries allowed to put motors on rickshaw, we call them "Tesla", And they are also another hazard, and menace for the price of faster transportation.
This made me test my own app with the book. And even though it had no issues loading it, it still left me thinking I can get much better performance on scrolling.
Interesting! I already have a Python script that can download anything from Gmail. Making it a product?! Really have not thought about it! Which is why I am probably broke Ha Ha
reply