Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | sterex's commentslogin

So?


Right? I wonder how much they paid for this article. Also strange timing talking about a “small” team of engineers when they’ve been in the news for having thousands of people manually moderating content.


This happens quite a bit even now. Many corporate Microsoft technology developers have a myopic view of the software world. This is on a downward trend, but still exists.


I understand what you are trying to say, but the movie ticket prices had sky rocketed beyond reach of a large section of the population. Now, you may argue that it is somehow the loss of the multiplexes by alienating people, but movies are somewhat of a necessity for cultural and social reasons.

Imagine having a consortium of telecom companies deciding to charge $100/Gb of data (assuming they are making profit nevertheless). There is no incentive for them to reduce the price.

To give you an example, a movie ticket would cost upto $20 in an economy where a bottle of water costs ~$0.2.


Is there a technical reason why it generates text with lot of spelling mistakes?

Ayn Rand seems very sloppy with her spelling!


Somehow I was hoping this was open source.


Please define "free".


Included a license, thanks for pointing out.


This isn't really a tricky question who understands how JS works. If a person has not experienced this situation of a function call (closures) within a loop, I'd suspect he has not much practical experience.

It's much more difficult to understand this theoretically than when encounter this while you code.


Having used loopback version 2, moving to version 3 was relatively easy. I don't think it will be the same from 3 to 4.

Introducing MVC architecture is good - I'm yet to go through the code, but I'm guessing this will be inline with how Laravel is built.

But, why TypeScript? This seems like a strange decision to me.


I've used Loopback for a while as well. IMO, TS is a welcome change, I'd be happy to write APIs in it and I'd prefer it to untyped libraries.

It's hard to understate how nice it is to have your editor autocomplete functions, argument order, object shape, etc. It's a real productivity booster, gets you sanity checking out of the gate and makes the framework discoverable. This is a good decision. I can't make any cogent argument against it, aside from dependency bloat.


Perhaps decoupling the <$.#> as (# x 0.01) would solve the problem right?

Not sure if that's what they do, but it isn't very complex.


Curious - Does CA have such a reputation?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: