You can use a digital Suica in Google Wallet only if your Android phone has Japan-spec hardware . International Android phones bought outside Japan generally cannot support digital Suica cards in Google Wallet.
Hardware/software-wise, yes, but putting money on the card is a problem if you don't have a credit/debit card issued by a Japanese bank (or perhaps a few others). That's fine for locals, of course, but not helpful for many foreign visitors.
As far as I could tell from everything I've read from multiple sources, every Pixel since Pixel 4 _has_ the chip, it's just not enabled and you can enable it with rooting.
I assume it's a licensing issue, where Google is too cheap to pay JR for the phones sold outside of Japan, so only setup the JP models and only pay the license for those.
I was interested in this because it happened the last time I returned to NZ, but I hadn't seen it before. There are several approved methods and it depends on the airline. The method that doesn't involve spraying with you onboard is more expensive so tends to be used by budget airlines, and also airlines who might rotate their planes and crew around routes more often because it is a treatment that lasts for weeks.
Probably depends on where the plane is coming from. Source: me who just returned from Europe last week, no spraying. And have traveled internationally several times in the last few years and also no spraying.
Rather, "there is no evidence to show that using insecticide to kill mosquitoes inside aircraft cabins is effective in preventing introduction and spread of mosquito-borne diseases."
As a kid (in the early 70s) I remember the air hostesses walking down the isles with a spray can. They don’t do that any more, but I wonder if or why they don’t add lower concentrations of the aerosol to the air conditioning at the end of the flight.
You could spend tens or hundreds of millions building an automatic system (certification for aircraft is not cheap or easy) or just hand the flight attendant a can of spray.
Sure, but I can imagine the more expensive airlines worrying that the ‘optics’ of spraying your passengers down aren’t great (to be clear - I’m not objecting and I’d rather they do it). I wasn’t suggesting they retrofit to existing aircraft of the period, but rather just build it in as they design the next generation airflow system. Or do you think it would still be way too expensive even then?
Adding systems to aircraft, whether retrofit or new design, is a horrifically complex and expensive thing.
What kind of disinfectant is used? How is it distributed? Does it do something bad at -80 degrees C? At +80 C? If it freezes, what happens? What if someone loads the wrong thing into the disinfectant bucket? Like fuel? Or oil? Where do we put the switch to isolate the cockpit from the disinfectant? Where does flipping that isolation switch go in the unknown-fume-event checklist?
What if it catches fire? It's not enough to say it can't catch fire, you must assume it will catch fire. The fire suppression system has to be aware of it. What if the fire suppression system erroneously thinks the disinfectant system is on fire? What if it was erroneously thought to be on fire, and then later _actually does catch fire_? How long can we fly with a flaming disinfectant system that someone in Terribadistan filled with kerosene?
You probably have more than one disinfectant module, probably attached to each pack. Is the plane "disinfected" if only one pack is operational? If your disinfectant module fails, does it bring the pack down with it? No? Now we have to certify the packs for both with-and-without disinfectant module operation.
Out of curiosity, how recent is this? I haven't owned my own macbook since the pre-touchbar era (I think the last model I had was the early 2015 Pro), and I had heard that Linux had gotten harder to boot since then due to newer firmware (I remember hearing for a time the newer models were yet to get wifi support on Linux, although I don't know how long that lasted), but at least up until then I was able to use a fairly typical Linux setup dual booted alongside MacOS. I remember using a blogpost I found as a reference, but I think the order of the steps I used were turning off FileVault, shrinking the main MacOS partition by the amount I wanted to use for Linux, doing the Linux install the way I normally do (one FAT ESP partition with refind installed, then the rest as a LUKS volume with LVM root and swap), turn off SIP by booting the macbook into recovery, booting into MacOS and running the `bless` command to set the refind partition to boot by default, rebooting back into recovery to turn SIP back on, and then finally booting back into MacOS and turning FileVault back on. Essentially, by temporarily turning off SIP and FileVault, I was able to get Linux booted by default with my usual LUKS/LVM setup but also have the option to select MacOS from my refind menu and have that booted with the usual FileVault/SIP protections. Based on what I'd read about the efforts to support Linux on the new ARM macbooks and Apple seemingly not going out of their way to block this, I would have thought that this method would still work, although maybe there's something I'm missing.
Oh wow, that is a big change! Even though I know Microsoft influenced and pushed the UEFI standard, my first macbook was my first introduction to EFI booting (since I had used legacy BIOS on my PCs up until college), so I've always associated it with Apple hardware.
Some snarky people would even say that modern Macs are in fact iPhones, just with a different form factor.
The unification of the operating systems for both devices continues with every macOS release. (And that's not only about the unification of the naming scheme…)
It absolutely can. Fedora uses HFS+ for the ESP on Macs because it integrates more cleanly into the Apple boot menu you get when you hold down command on boot, but the firmware handles FAT just fine.
Just be a little careful with the state returns on CashApp. It has a bug on handling mortgage interest deductions if your mortgage is over $750000 and the state allows deduction up to $1000000. Double check by filing with other tax software and verify the refund amount is the same. I used freetaxusa.com to get this right.
Cash App taxes has a bug where mortgage interest deduction is not handled properly with state vs federal. If your mortgage is more than 750000$ and your state is California or a state allows deduction up to a million $ in mortgage interest then you will end up getting a lower refund.
Cash app also couldn't file my ev credit correctly. Support was significantly worse than useless. Ended up going with Free Tax USA this year but I've also seen bugs with them.
reply