That's what people would have said 3 years ago about going against google (and search engines in general), yet here we are.

Revolution is in the air.

Google is doing great... Record profits this year, not sure I'd call that a "revolution".

Google of Thesseus.

> look at this pile of residential proxies hitting your site

How does it know that?

Yeah, my impression is that even the best LLMs are pretty bad at analysing big data directly.

It's not even the hallucinations that are the biggest problem, it's more that they're so bad at managing their context windows that they end up ignoring huge chunks of the data without realising that they're doing it. You end up with a result that looks plausible but is often extremely misleading.

A better approach seems to be getting the LLM to write code to use more traditional analysis techniques (eg. iterative k-means, or whatever). That way you can at least be confident that you've looked at all the data rather than just a small slice of it.

They're still living on the good will earned from Gnome 2

Devs like to pretend they know everything about everything.

Start a discussion about any topic, look at how many nerds will tell you that you are wrong.

He doesn't want your trust, he wants you to use it.

I think AI will be like electricity. Invisible.

Invisible during operation, yes. But once an agent starts acting on your behalf, you still need a way to inspect what it did and why.

In Claworld, we currently have the agent handle social exploration quietly, then return a short report and transcript when something deserves attention. The tension is making the system disappear without making its judgment opaque.

You're saying we need magic for different js frameworks to have different performance profiles?

> that day is over.

I see zero indications of this. As a matter of fact, I see evidence of the opposite, the Chinese government has just come out in support of open weight AI last week.

Not sure they're just recouping costs and not lining their execs pockets.

It's easy to tell. Just look up how much profit is being made.

To be honest, I don't get how I would use it. I understand the text I send will be encrypted, but what does using it actually look like.

Thanks, perhaps while its hard to get the public recognition behind such tool when starting out, I should make more real demos of how it works with messengers and create Demo bot + verifier account across messengers where the user can try it out immediately after downloading :)

Yes, or you can record gifs and feature them prominently on the front page of your GitHub, for example?