Do not censor the internet. Please rethink forcing ISPs to Block “Adult” Sites.
As part of the Digital Economy Bill 2016-17 the government has officially announced that Mobile and fixed line broadband providers in the United Kingdom will be forced to block all “adult” websites. This is a slippery slope which can be used to force ever increasing censorship on undesirable views.
The bill also introduces a new power that forces payment services (e.g. VISA, Mastercard) to withdraw support from non-compliant sites. The legislation uses the term “adult content” (i.e. open to interpretation and mission creep.) Dating, self-harm support, social networks, different political views and medical sites have historically been tagged as “adult content“. More at: http://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2016/11/uk-government-c...
Whilst it isn't ready yet, it would be better to link to the petition page. (Ie, there is no chance I am signing a petition without reading the text first!)
If all people felt that way no one would run drugstores, and there'd be ZERO plasters / bandaids available on the market.
"It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest." --Adam Smith
While it does seem weird that coaches and organizers of these events - and even the parents - don't carry first-aid stuff with them... do your local pharmacies/chemists' just hand out medical supplies if you walk in off the street?
Any business is required to have a first aid kit on site and render help when asked to. If you organize any sort of event it's even doubly true. Not to mention that any car is legally required to have first aid kit to pass its yearly technical inspection(this is in Poland). So in an emergency you can run into any shop or stop any car on the road and you should get whatever first aid kits come with.
Wow, that's pretty awesome. The car first aid kit is not a thing in America (at least, I've never heard of it - there may be regional regulations in the colder parts of the country), and I think that while businesses are required to have first aid kits, they only have to render aid in severe cases (e.g., I can't walk in and ask for a bandaid because I got a papercut.)
Well yes, when I said they have to help I meant more like an emergency, not a papercut - but I guess most people would be happy to give you a plaster(bandaid) anyway.
This is awesome. It might be just what I was looking for. However their site's animation is too abrupt and distracting. They need to reduce the frequency of changes a bit.
These seem to be for pure tech roles, look for product manager roles at workinstartups or jobserve - then again startups are least likely to hire on skilled Visa reqs. Good luck either way. Dont know anyone relevant I can put you onto unfortunately.
We generally try to adopt the philosophy of making the existing features really good before building new ones, and there is a lot of low-hanging fruit for us to pick for now.
I'd like to get geospacial support in, but it will take a bit of time before we can get to that. We'll likely get it in within a year, so it's a fairly long-term feature for now.
It isn't surprising, but it is worth talking about.
I subscribe to "nothing to hide" but it would be nice to, at least, have some notification and callback over who had access to my personal details.
I don't really mid my information bing used to infer if pot-holes are more important to fix than water leaks. I do however object, without prior consent, for my details to be a way of supporting political movements /ideologies.
Yup, agreed. Although I bet there's a less intrusive means of aggregating citizen data germane to things like road maintenance than capturing our web browsing history, emails, and phone calls. IBM's Smart Cities initiative is essentially all about that -- distributing sensors throughout infrastructure for the purpose of gathering just that sort of data. That seems like a much more worthy investment in technology than massive data centers that suck up our chatter -- chatter which we have a reasonable expectation of privacy over, by the way.
Assuming that you hit your usage is at 100% capacity then from a read prospective DynamoDB is half the price. Writes are much more expensive but many applications are heavily read oriented.
DynamoDB claims single digit millisecond reads, azure tables does not (from my experience.)
Azure tables have a maximum performance over a given partition table of 500 requests per second and over the whole account of 5,000 requests per second. DynamoDB does not state this.
Can you please explain your math? AFAIK Azure txns are not paid by the hour - they are a flat cost of $.01 per 10000 storage txns. If you do batched GETs and PUTs you make only 550 txns (55000/100 entites/batch).
I agree that Dynamo's provisioned throughput capacity is a very useful feature though. Azure does not provide any such performance guarantee; the throughput limit is also a guideline as far as i know, not an absolute barrier.
I should have explained that my costs were calculated on a "per day" assumption. Thus the costs are for:
5000 x 60 x 60 x 24 = 432000000 Writes
50000 x 60 x 60 x 24 = 4320000000 Reads
(432000000/10000) x 0.01 = $432
(4320000000/10000) x 0.01 = $4320
Azure Total Cost For One Days Use: $4752
((5000/10) x 0.01) x 24 = $120
((50000/50) x 0.01) x 24 = $240
AWS Total Cost For One Days Use: $360
You are right that I don't take into account the bulk feature of azure reads & writes but this is down to bulk requests only being possible on a single partition at a time which in my personal experience (not exhaustive) is non-trivial to take advantage of.
The cost difference between Windows Azure Tables and DynamoDB really depends upon the size of the entities being operated over and the amount of data stored. If an application can benefit from batch transactions or query operations, the savings can be a lot per entity using Windows Azure Tables.
For the cost of storage. The base price for Windows Azure Tables is $0.14/GB/month, and the base price for DynamoDB is $1.00/GB/month.
For transactions, there is the following tradeoff
• DynamoDB is cheaper if the application performs operations mainly on small items (couple KBs in size), and the application can’t benefit from batch or query operations that Windows Azure Tables provide
• Windows Azure Tables is cheaper for larger sized entities, when batch transactions are used, or when range queries are used
The following shows the cost of writing or reading 1 million entities per hour (277.78 per second) for different sized entities (1KB vs 64KB). It also includes the cost difference between strong and eventually consistent reads for DynamoDB. Note, Windows Azure Tables allows batch operations and queries for many entities at once, at a discounted price. The cost shown below is the cost per hour for writing or reading 1,000,000 entities per hour (277.78 per second).
• 1KB single entity writes -- Azure=$1 and DynamoDB=$0.28
• 64KB single entity writes -- Azure=$1 and DynamoDB=$17.78
• 1KB batch writes (with batch size of 100 entities) -- Azure=$0.01 and DynamoDB=$0.28
• 64KB batch writes (with batch size of 100 entities) -- Azure=$0.01 and DynamoDB=$17.78
• 1KB strong consistency reads -- Azure=$1 and DynamoDB=$0.05
• 64KB strong consistency reads -- Azure=$1 and DynamoDB=$3.54
• 1KB strong consistency reads via query/scan (assuming 50 entities returned on each request) – Azure=$0.02, DynamoDB=$0.05
• 64KB strong consistency reads via query/scan (assuming 50 entities returned on each request) – Azure=$0.02, DynamoDB=$3.54
Would be interested in details about any with Strong Consistency, decent replication across fault areas, which get the same level of performance (single digit ms) at a cost equivalent to dynamodb.
Quite a lot can be done with smart use of hugely scalable simple key-value maps.
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/173407/sponsors/aeX...
It reads:
Do not censor the internet. Please rethink forcing ISPs to Block “Adult” Sites.
As part of the Digital Economy Bill 2016-17 the government has officially announced that Mobile and fixed line broadband providers in the United Kingdom will be forced to block all “adult” websites. This is a slippery slope which can be used to force ever increasing censorship on undesirable views.
The bill also introduces a new power that forces payment services (e.g. VISA, Mastercard) to withdraw support from non-compliant sites. The legislation uses the term “adult content” (i.e. open to interpretation and mission creep.) Dating, self-harm support, social networks, different political views and medical sites have historically been tagged as “adult content“. More at: http://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2016/11/uk-government-c...