You mean the typically most oppressed minorities these days, given that you people freak out about these people constantly?

Are you saying that straight white Christen men are the most oppressed group in the US?

Yes, I believe they are unironically saying that.

What about use case for replacing regex? I.e "random formatted title.extension" - extract the title or some tag or something for more dynamic string manipulation for pulling structured data out of strings efficiently and more simply than regex provides?

You may want to reword that.. what do you think 0 confidence means... ?

Time to make creative software for linux that can replace adobe for Video/photo editing :P

GIMP isn't bad these days, I use it constantly

It does.

Sorry, I did. And I did an internal sharing with respect to the blog post, on topics of how to (and not to) do software migration, how (not) to deal with unknown unknowns etc. We have several ongoing software (automated) migration projects so I did rather extensive research around it.

I do regret that I've also read the code though, otherwise I'd probably live a little happier with ignorance right now. Sadly as they don't know they don't know about the issues, there's no indication of those in the two public materials they have released.

Does that not prove this test should be well burried by now?

Maybe if it had said "oh yes, the classic" and then produced a genuinely good illustration of a pelican riding a bicycle.

For what it’s worth, I enjoy the pelican test. I don’t care if it’s scientific. It’s a fun thing I look forward to when a new model drops.

The cost there is multiple rounds of review tokens making it both slow and expensive.

There are many models that are neither slow nor expensive that are suitable for targeted review tasks.

These things are still very far from human-level intelligence. Maybe a touch beyond a golden retriever in processing power. Ratcheting the intelligence up a notch from there is expensive. It’s a lot cheaper to simplify the problem it’s solving instead.

Man-computer symbiosis is the void: mechanically extended man or AI.

Distilling LLMs are a reversal of that.

But isn't it running basically 1 request at a time? This would make agentic coding difficult right? Compared to running as many sequential tests as you want via api?

Yea I don’t use sub-agent style workflows. I often use planning patterns and generate markdown for really complex tasks, but never got into the sub-agent thing. I am likely closer to AI-assisted, though I am heavily using pi coding agent and my editor is basically just for viewing files and changes now.

wait until you hear why, and that you can optionally use e2e but lose other functionality.

And end-to-end encryption not supported on web client and doesn't sync properly between devices. Useless.

>> doesn't sync properly between devices

which is good, actually. We don't want a way through which a server could tell a new device all the information it needs to decrypt messags

I thought this was a long solved problem: the server syncs encrypted data, and the user provides the decryption key from another device (via QR codes, BLE, …)

Make it device-to-device then

yeah, it is good! I hate usability features too!

You either have E2EE or you don't. If you have usability, you don't have E2EE.

I can't have E2EE and also have cross device data sync?

counter point https://github.com/GrayHatter/toxcore/tree/multi-device (I guess technically you'd need https://github.com/uTox/uTox/tree/mdev too)