Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | phantompeace's commentslogin

Nobody called anyone schizophrenic. They noted that the irrelevant link spam in a reply was reminiscent of schizophrenic posting. If you've spent any sort of time on places like 4chan, you'd understand. I don't think posting the HN guidelines is warranted here.

>Nobody called anyone schizophrenic. They noted that the irrelevant link spam in a reply was reminiscent of schizophrenic posting.

Come on, that's being incredibly pedantic. If I say, your comment reminds me of someone being an asshole, I'm just using a circumlocution to call you an asshole. No?



Care to explain how the terroristic Epstein Regime triple tapped a school in Iran recently? I'm waiting for your admonishment


I'm not surprised given the incessant bot activity. Top contributors are most likely bots. Other than that, I remember Ghislaine Maxwell as being a supermod across multiple high profile subreddits, so banning them seems like a good move.


Why did you consciously click into this article and comments section if you don't want to hear about it? You're free to scroll on at any time.


Which recent jailings were made for social media posts? Are you talking about the ones where people invited violence against migrants in hotels by calling for things like setting fire to their dwellings etc? Because that's a crime regardless of posting it on social media.


Commonly referred to as the Epstein Regime


Considering the very small difference between just SFT on the student model as compared to SFT + DPO on a proxy, doesn't it make sense to concentrate on ensuring the SFT dataset is perfect rather than sorry about DPO etc? And just train directly on the student model?


Do you really think an LLM will replace a surgeon?


Why not?

Surgeons already perform remote surgery, so physical dexterity isn't the issue.

What do you think the moat is? Computer vision? Surgical technique? Surgical knowledge? Medical knowledge?

Maybe surgeons will be smart enough not to allow AI to be trained to do what they do, but it seems that training data is the only real barrier.


Why are we believing in marketing lies? For instance, crypto is useful (in a narrow context) even if it's 99.99% scams, and has positively impacted at least some people (the unbanked), even if it fell short of replacing the world's banking system. It's good tech.

Similarly with LLMs, it's good tech, but I do not believe for a single second that these things will ever replace anyone who is remotely skilled. People will be augmented by them. They won't be fully replaced. Well, I hope not anyway.


Surgery is a regulated field with high barriers to entry. Even if surgeons did not get replaced, displaced humans in other fields would not find employment in surgery.


I don't think so but it will not stop folks from trying. The panacea of AI is AGI which basically, in theory, will replace any human/thing.


How do you know it's being served at wildly below cost? AFAIK API pricing across the board is actually higher than what inference would cost? Yes there are subscription plans that subsidise tokens but they exist primarily to hook people in, so as to encourage their workplace to adopt it, whereby they then have to pay for an enterprise plan with zero subsidies like the subscription plans have. Training is very expensive, but you only do that once.

I predict costs will fall.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: