Have bacteria been witnesses to turn into more complex, totally-different bacteria? And then multi-celled organisms that have never been seen? The jumps that macro-evolution claims like they saw it yesterday are much more complex than bacteria regularly turning into multi-celled organisms. Add that to the list of changes we should be seeing all the time if millions of species evolved this way. Similarly, add it to the list of observations falsifying evolution that bacteria adapt rapidly but never become higher forms.

You heavily believe in what you have repeatedly not observed. After sample size hits hundreds of millions to billions, your confidence goes through the roof that this absolutely happened millions of times when you weren’t watching.

How is that science if hypotheses and validates theories are built on observed data? If anything, it sounds like a massive amount of faith in an imaginary model that’s the opposite of global observations.

This is why we say we (usually) don’t have as much faith as atheists or evolutionists. Many of us have seen multiple examples of answered prayers, miracles, or God speaking to us. What’s predicted keeps happening. Since Darwin, we’ve seen zero examples of bacteria, ants, chickens, or cats turning into other animals. So, you have faith and unrelenting faith at that.

Large Corps arent exactly well known to handle the Explore part of the Explore-Exploit Tradeoff.

On the flip side lot of open source devs are going to get 100x more productive in the Exploit part than the avg coder monkey at large corp.

Nothing is obvious and predictable about where that story goes in an ever growing ever changing system.

Large corps will keep funding whoever gets the job done. While AI might replace lot of Large Corps activity which is basically on the Exploit side of the Tradeoff.