Funny, is recently searched “match plate in French“ the LLM went straight to match sticks and dinner plates, and the dummizer in search fixed “plate“ to “play“ and went into soccer territory.

I still have no clue how the foundry pattern is called in my native language.

> fixed “plate“ to “play“ and went into soccer territory.

Well, a soccer search lets Google make more money by showing you more-profitable ads. /only-partial-sarcasm

To be ironic, maybe the list of the files is original :) It's a very open minded curation.

I would venture that's it's the whole reason they use it. because it doesn't work.

If anything, it’s a very conservative estimate. Short of a major turn of events it seems very unlikely Anthropic’s revenue growth is going to slow to zero.

I have not clicked, but recently I was suggested a video whose title was more or less: “everybody thinks 1984 agrees with them”.

I do recommend that one. Jacob Geller could talk for 3 hours about impressionist paintings and I guarantee it would be fascinating.

Funny, along the same lines I asked an AI to write some wasm text. It was ridiculously bad and I had to intervene heavily to get something working as intended.

For people interested, you can do FTS in DuckDB without using the official module. I copy-pasted the relevant parts and slightly changed it for my need.

https://github.com/nraynaud/sojourner/blob/main/PDS/db_creat...

Example: https://nraynaud.github.io/sojourner/PDS/explore.html

In France we had a case where the government tried to bring terrorist charges against someone, the problem is that the police couldn’t materially have seen what they wrote in their report, because their car was too far and the timing didn’t line up correctly. Eventually the policemen invoked confidentiality rules against their mobile phones so that no accurate probing could be made. The judge threw away the terrorist charges anyways, because the facts didn’t warrant it. Since the police knew exact facts without being there, there is a high suspicion they used illegal spying on the people and tried to launder the data.

Parallel construction poorly executed.

So I gather that nobody is working on a search that stays on the current branch?

I took it as the extracted spec was weird and they looked into it.

I concur, “the Germans” have created an algorithm that completely “see through” subqueries/CTEs when planning a query. The way the query is written has no bearing on the execution.

By the Germans, as you referring to Thomas Neumann's database group at TMU, Munich?

*TUM (Technical University of Munich).