That is so cool, that now I'm brainstorming CLI things to build that need a sparkline. Wonder if Claude Code can learn to use this.

So why no self-hosted GitLab then?

GitLab is also getting worse and worse. They're going full-in on AI and each new release is more cluttered with useless features and requires more and more resources to run smoothly. After six years self-hosting a GitLab instance for a few hundred users (among which a few dozens are quite active), I abandoned this summer and I'm currently migrating the instance to Forgejo.

It's a shame because I like GitLabs UX and runners much more than other forges. I've been considering forking gitlab and removing complexity. GitLab uses multiple GB of memory idle with no users. It's sad.

I agree. GitLab UI was great and the simplicity of its CI/CD is unequaled on other forges. It's sad that Forgejo went with the actions model from GitHub which introduce a lot of useless complexity. But it seems that Woodpecker CI [1] could be a good candidate to replace GitLab CI, as it uses very similar concepts and workflow description files.

[1] https://woodpecker-ci.org/

I love it how this is still at thing. Good principles never die, just like good music I guess.

Pretty cool tool! Congrats! Not sure if I'm missing something but this tells you where your tokens went, breakdown per day/tool. So the "why" is still a question left for the user to answer. Can be something like "Because I was missing a good CLAUDE.md file so it had to explore the whole repo before doing any work" or anything else. Just my take.

They do but chances are it's not 100% effective.

Rather, "there is no evidence to show that using insecticide to kill mosquitoes inside aircraft cabins is effective in preventing introduction and spread of mosquito-borne diseases."

https://www.epa.gov/mosquitocontrol/aircraft-disinsection

Not sure where the idea came from that spraying the cabin aisle would penetrate the luggage bins, cargo hold, under the seats, or really anywhere.

1. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

2. Risk is convex, so every risk increase by measures not taken is multiplicative, not additive.

The real question must be: does the disinfection do more harm than it provides reduction of risk.

> 2. Risk is convex, so every risk increase by measures not taken is multiplicative, not additive.

Wait. Is this true? f(x) = x^2 is convex but f(x+d) = f(x) + O(x). Are you saying that human risk assessment is estimated to be exponential?

I guess this can still happen, depends for each person. Some people have higher immunity for certain bugs.

I like how agent review is a deprecation target. explicitly. Se then a harness matures by getting dumber and cheaper, not smarter.

Marginally misleading title, article mentioned that "Nvidia has been in talks", not agreed to anything just yet.

https://www.theinformation.com/articles/nvidia-agrees-buy-op... is a little more definitive but paywalled and still doesn't confirm the other side of the deal - Hugging Face agreeing to the purchase.

Coming soon...

It's Anthropic's way of making sure you're spreading out your usage :)