Utilitarianism can justify that kind of policy/behavior. It makes economical sense, with your free the burden of society it free resources so people be more productive, afford things, live happier lifes (at least on the material sense), have children.

Though I don't subscribe to utilitarianism or the notion that the value of an human being can be reduced to its economical aspects. It's not my moral compass.

The dangers of giving agency to a model that is highly technically competent but have no illative sense whatsoever.

What is intelligence? Better to call it LLM.

Opus also do this kind of tehcnically competentent but dumb deviations to fix a simple issue where asking for input would be better. Models have no illative sense.

Could you explain why?

It feels to me that Altman became humbler for the lack if a better word?

And OpenAI's general communication as of late feels more grounded, much more pleasant than Anthropic comms. They also seem to be focusing on users quite a bit more.

Anthropic's communication style feels like I somehow owe them my life or something.

This was very different a year ago.

Anthropic comms gives this vibe that Amodei and other goons want to be your dads.

They have no illative sense like we do.

Maybe due to lack of data and dimensions other than words.

The same Noam Chomsky which was a friend of Epstein which had ties to Israel high schelon.

Let's not forget the asymmetry. If someone calls that modern Israel isn't the biblical Israel and that in biblical terms it's closer to the "synagogue of Satan" (Revelation 2:9) it risks being persecuted, ostracized, fired, prosecuted, jailed, murdered.

You shouldn't dismiss Israel power in cultural warfare, financial and political ties. Epstein was probably the tip of the iceberg.

And that can be recognized without diminishing the intrinsic dignity of every human being that live in Israel and outside of it independently of race, nationality, religion, etc.