I feel you. not sure if the "Glimmer" (of hope) branding is intentional to capture this vibe

the Ken Liu story linked in the article is actually spot on. would recommend giving that a quick read

I laughed. underrated comment

you beat me lol

this reminds me of this other flavor of "program as weights" I saw few months ago, putting deterministic programs inside the weights of an LLM

https://www.percepta.ai/blog/constructing-llm-computer

quite a few people I know consume edibles as the main form of cannabis. but it seems underrepresented in all the studies I've seen so far. as several others have pointed out, you would think the act of smoking would itself have nontrivial effects on health

One can also use vapes. I avoid the cartridge types as I don't want to guess what was used to process them. Instead I use a simple flower vape which on the face of it should be less bad than say smoking from a joint or bong.

Gummies and other edibles though require processing in the liver before they become active in the body (they are converted to a slightly different form of THC) so you would need to consider whether there are any negative effects on liver health from edibles and then compare to the various 'inhaled' methods.

General friendly advice - for anything not flower, try to get things that are made by live rosin (not resin) as they are the cleanest and should not involve the use of any hydrocarbon solvents for extraction. Live resin would be next, though it does use hydrocarbons. Distilliates which are often in vape cartridges are almost always made with hydrocarbons. While the production method shouldn't matter if everything is done 100% properly, it does require trust that all the butane, etc has been fully removed from the final product.

I really don't understand why anyone who has the means to buy a decent dry herb vape smokes it. I have a friend who's a daily smoker who just refuses to make the change. Has an absolutely terrible cough and yet he persists with smoking.

i researched and experimented with edibles after beign diagnosed with CVD.

i don't beleive edibles are any safer

same. the older I get, the more I appreciate the "middle of the world" attitude in classical Chinese teachings. there's no single approach that's always / universally right. so it's wise to avoid going to the extreme in any direction

this seems like a chain of good practices. though I find it hard to stay disciplined about keeping commits well scoped and well described

Becoming very comfortable with "rebase --interactive" and other cmds for editing your (local!) history before merging helps a lot. Once you are, it only adds 5m or so of extra work to most PRs. And while acquiring this knowledge used to be difficult, LLMs make it very easy these days.

I would also recommend an editor designed for rebases. I use the nodejs rebase-editor TUI (though it looks like the old non-vibecoded releases have been removed from github, so unclear on the current availability of this one) which makes it easier to organize

You can setup most PR systems to squash on merge using the first commit's message, then enforce that the top commit message is prefixed with a ticket ID. This practice has many benefits: readable git log, easier git bisect for tracking down regressions, it becomes easy to find all commits associated with a block of work, more useful git blame.

I strongly recommend against auto-squashing. It creates large commits without the semantic intent of the author. In a large PR, you want clean, small, semantic commits, which makes it much easier to review and understand.

I agree, though it feels like a bit of a lost cause at times to get people to make those commits

Written a while ago but spot on

> AI can hallucinate, but I've been misdiagnosed by humans so many times too...

I've heard this experience from quite a few folks before, but this is my first time hearing about a mandatory 8 months quarantine as a consequence... damn