Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | kryptiskt's commentslogin

I don't see what the role of AI is in this. You don't need an AI to aggregate data from a bunch of sources. You'd be better off having the AI write a scraper for you than burning GPU time on an agent doing the same thing every time.

If you're paying a monthly fee for your agent, might as well use it to save you another few mins

Sony made a water-proof phone long before fixed batteries became fashionable.

Samsung too

Back in the day, a GHC release had a bug that deleted source files with errors in them: https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/issues/163. Which is pretty harsh as diagnostics go.

That guy has a history of harassment in Debian, and is not a credible source.

The director of the FSF is not a credible source? All the harassed and exploited third-world women are not credible? Certainly more credible than this guy.

That was back when there was "real" UNIX around, as well as a number of clones, including Microsofts own Xenix (maybe they had offloaded that to SCO by then). So UN*X was one way to indicate that it meant UNIX-like OSes.

Turns out SCO bought Xenix in 1987, but Microsoft was just a couple of years removed from being the biggest Unix vendor around at this point.

I guess that's probably Apple now.

Or IBM?

z/OS is officially a Unix


There are an awful lot of iOS and macOS devices out there

macOS is a certified UNIX[0], but iOS isn’t.

[0] https://www.opengroup.org/openbrand/register/


I still think Macs outnumber IBM mainframe and POWER machines by a couple orders of magnitude.

By unit count, no question.

By revenue? Genuinely uncertain.


Wasn't it just a couple of weeks ago that they started supporting M3? That smells like progress to me.

One can start working on creation of a teleportation device. Doesn't mean we have it.

https://asahilinux.org/docs/platform/feature-support/m3/

What do you see as progress here? Nothing is supported, everything is "to be announced" (i.e. unsupported).


they likely meant this progress post showing a desktop booting on an M3 mac: https://www.reddit.com/r/AsahiLinux/comments/1qnddjd/m3_now_... albeit with software graphics

Looks believable that they are indeed the devs behind the project, but it's weird to post stuff like that to... reddit? They have a site for the project, why not post there?

You could read the updates... https://asahilinux.org/2025/10/progress-report-6-17/

Not marketing a not yet complete feature on their website makes total sense. People on internet hating Asahi linux just cause seems like weird to me.


> New MICROVM kernel for x86, supporting both i386 and amd64, NetBSD 11.0 introduces a dedicated MICROVM kernel designed for extremely fast virtual machines boot, leveraging PVH boot, VirtIO MMIO, and multiple kernel optimizations, it can boot in about 10 ms on 2020-era x86 CPUs.

Exciting


This sounds pretty cool. I have a couple of old DELL 630s that were automotive diagnostic computers, due to them being the last model with a real hardware serial port. Now I am thinking of reviving them with Linux, but just to host old windows VMs (all the auto diag software is windows only). Maybe I should give netbsd a try here.

Why would that be? Do you expect this to make your Windows VMs start up faster?

It won't. This applies only to NetBSD guest VMs.


great callout

> If you want to code by hand, then do it! No one's stopping you. But we shouldn't pretend that you will be able to do that professionally for much longer.

Bullshit. The value in software isn't in the number of lines churned out, but in the usefulness of the resulting artifact. The right 10,000 lines of code can be worth a billion dollars, the cost to develop it is completely trivial in comparison. The idea that you can't take the time to handcraft software because it's too expensive is pernicious and risks lowering quality standards even further.


I thought typos was a signifier for human-created these days, because an LLM is unlikely to land on something that is not a word.


I agree with you. I'll speculate no further.

If you are a bank or a bookmaker or similar you may well want to have total control of physical access to the machines. I know one bookmaker I worked with had their own mini-datacenter, mainly because of physical security.


I am pretty forward-thinking but even when I started writing my first web server 30+ years ago I didn’t foresee the day when the phrase “my bookie’s datacenter” might cross my lips.


Most trading venues are in Equinix data centers.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: