because the social media sites that do will outcompete once people get personal AI coaches that tell them to use technology that is better for them.

How is an AI posting on your social media better for you?

It's not, but token peddlers will say it is. It's good to interact with everything through buying tokens.

And how will a token peddler's social media company survive after the hype runs out?

People on LinkedIn who are trying to build their "personal brand" seem to favor it. In fact, that's basically all the platform is these days.

School should be this, but applied to literally everything. Ideally with AI generating it all.

Interesting example on how I envision software to evolve in the future because massive abundance caused by AI. Massively composable and interoperable.

Triangle kind of reminds me of the Bermuda Triangle. You know how many people died there?

People? Do you know how many of them are murderers, fraudsters and all around finks. That's a terrible thing to mention.

Regulations can often be bad for progress so a CBA is probably best. Doesn't matter about the framing.

What do you mean framing doesn't matter? You just called the other post 'acidic' The idea that a CBA is somehow useful outside of any moral context is facially ridiculous anyway. You're just spewing word-mumbo-jumbo. The entire point of the law is to uphold the basic moral values of society in its function.

I suppose you would need to weigh the utility points lost from people no longer enjoying their jobs with the positive utility points gained by the consumers of products and services.

My intuition is that with the law of leverage in mind, the former would be relatively low and the latter would be relatively high.

It is of course up to the government and culture to minimize the former and maximize the latter.

for fear of being overly utilitarian here its not really an issue that people are manipulatable but that they are manipulated into doing the wrong things (consumerism, political divide-and-conquer strategies)

and rejecting manipulation from a deontological stance reduces agency and output for doing good in the real world

manipulation = campaigns = advertisements = psyops (all the same, different connotations)

I would recommend talking out loud to it with speech to text software, it has been pretty helpful for me. Like around 60s of talking.

Irrelevant but I like this pattern of using Gemini (or AI outputs in general) as sources. Please continue to do so and I encourage any readers to also adopt this pattern. I will also try to implement this pattern.

The sources are in the report. Gemini provides actual references for all the claims made. You'd know that if you actually looked but lack of intellectual rigor is expected when people are afraid of actually scrutinizing their beliefs of non-constructive inevitability.

maybe you misread the post you‘re answering to here or are you suspecting sarcasm? the poster commended your usage of the footnote with the gemini convo as far as i can tell?

Laid it on a little too thick to be sincere & more generally I don't comment on internet forums to be complimented on my response style. Address the substance of my arguments or just save yourself the keystrokes.

It was a compliment and I was hoping to nudge the behavior of other HN comments.

If you really can't see the irony of using AI to make up your thoughts on AI then perhaps there's keystrokes to be saved on your end as well.

I recommend you address the content & substance of the argument in any further responses to my posts or if you can't do that then figure out a more productive way to spend your time. I'm sure there is lots of work to be done in automated theorem proving.