Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | hmoghnie's commentslogin

backend : ratpack + java + kotlin + ebean (sql orm) + postgresql

frontend : VueJS


All those different symbols were a real shitshow and people just couldn't deal with that crap, now that they are going to sort this out it won't be a pain in the ass anymore with them flushing their old way of doing things away.


So apparently I have to subscribe first in order to read the article... NO, thank you.


I wonder when will they shut it down.


Always been.


no i set another email. but still both emails will get the link.


This is not correct. Or at least, it should not be AFAIK.

I actually just tried it on an account I own, and it does not send the email to both addresses, only to the recovery email address.

If that is really happening to you, that sounds like a bug to me.


Is the person that hacked the account just sitting there waiting for emails to come in and hopefully can click the "Cancel Request" before you can reset the password?


If you make a habit of hacking Gmail accounts, it's probably not hard to make a bot that does it for you.


you are absolutely right.


My mistake was that I didn't enable 2 factor authentication. I contacted them and offered to supply a copy of my password and driver license, they said the only way is to go through the dysfunctional online method to recover the password.

I did create another account, they still send the link to cancel the request to the original account!!!


  My mistake was that I didn't enable 2 factor authentication.
Kind of aggressive calling out Google's engineers when you couldn't bother protecting yourself with their free and easy to use security mechanisms.


Except that now Google has my phone number linked to my identity too. I know this is not everyone's use case, but for those of us that care deeply about privacy, that's not a good alternative.

If that's not a good counterpoint, my phone/SMS service sucks when I'm traveling abroad, which is exactly when Google thinks I'm not me.

I wish Google supported TOTP like Github does, without asking for a phone number.


> I wish Google supported TOTP like Github does... Goid nees, they do! They even have an app for it.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Authenticator


Yes, they do, but there's no way to set it up without giving your phone number first. Whenever I enter into the 2FV options, I have to give a phone number, no alternative. I have no idea why. Sorry I wasn't clear enough.


And a PAM module!


Are you sure that's still the case?

This[1] would seem to indicate you can use a U2F device[2] as an alternative to providing a cell phone for verification.

[1] https://www.google.com/landing/2step/#tab=how-it-works

[2] http://googleonlinesecurity.blogspot.com/2014/10/strengtheni...


My guess is that you can eventually enable that, but not at first. When I click on the "get started" button, I get "Step 1: Set up your phone", with no alternative button in sight.


Does gmail support using a second email as the second factor? Hotmail does...


The entire account system does.


If you didn't enable 2FA, how on earth is Google or anyone for that matter able to verify it's you that owns the email address? Anyone at any time could claim they were hacked, and it's not like they require a drivers license ID when you register.

Honestly I'm not sure what Google can do here that (a) doesn't require them to now individually support users ($$$) or (b) doesn't open them up to thousands of erroneous claims.


I would prefer a system where I can pay $100 to Google to get a competent human to look at the case versus now where I can hope I have a friend of a friend to make enough noise to get someone's attention.


I think we all would, but the OP knew this when he registered! This is not a new revelation about Google support.


will try, thx


Tried that, It will send me a link to the original hacked email with a link to cancel the request !!!!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: