How is it illegal if it is in the ToS? (I didn't check)

If it were in the ToS I imagine there would be huge outcry and all the enterprise customers would leave immediately and sue.

From TFA “The Canario source code is still there in the older versions of Rio. People can fork that if they want to. All good from my side.”

Yes, but if he's going to keep developing it on his end, why not release that source too? The source exists, so it's not any extra work to throw a tarball over the wall without any other engagement.

Or just turn off issues and pull requests. To skip right ahead to a closed source project is a little suspicious.

I think there is room for arguing children raised in the high flying city have been robbed of something as well. Can’t have it all and one is not objectively better than the other if you look at the full picture.

Certainly room for such discussion. However if the parent waits to first save a large sum before moving there (instead of moving there straight out of high school), their revealed preferences suggest even they do not feel the tiny village is great for young people.

How do you think a responsible administration, members of your party of choice, would differ on this matter? Or EVs?

Perhaps by thinking more than zero steps ahead.

An administration filled with people who read books that don't have pictures might, for example, consider the chilling effects this anti-free market, anto-competitive nonsense will have on our economy and the economies of our allies.

They might even consider two steps into the very near future and realize that the last nations to automate will become the poorest nations almost overnight, and be forced to watch as the price of good declines for the entire world except their shifty, isolated, tariffed, backwater.

Heck, such and administration might even have a few scientists and economists left employed who could advise them, having not just forced many of the best and brightest to flee to more enlightened parts of the world just to stay employed or live in a places that don't treat inconvenient truths as blasphemy.

Maybe by not being the most blatantly corrupt assholes of all time?

Add in time zone of the commenter and potentially some really interesting data emerges.

Such as?

Respectful of liberty. A spear is also a tool for killing. Respect for life is not an expectation of the tool.

Those damn commies have banned me from owning an ICBM

Because anti-Elon thinking is a thing that really seems to impact the judgement of some people and this kind of news really gets them to engage

The "anti-Elon thinking" comes from the things Elon says and does.

Like?

Inflammatory partisan and identity politics activism.

Directly interfering in the u.s. government

A consistent pattern of grandiose over-promising and under-delivering in his products (FSD, robotaxis, electric-semi, boring company etc)

and plenty more

Bingo, hacker news has this tendency hence this is on the front page.

Thanks, appreciated. I read about 2/3 or the article. I like the content, and appreciate that it doesn’t scream “written by AI”, but it did get long winded in places.

Then you set up a shared directory with common group permissions

Why would you allow devUser sudo?

normally you wouldn't but there are some instances where a script or something requires sudo in which case you would need to namespace the cgroup and do a little more work to prevent escaping the sandbox. I can think of a few cases where sudo is required for cgroups/containers from the sandbox side so it can install services and things but ideally you would isolate everything to the devUser UID or GID.