> But one of the really neat things about AI is that there is no limit in sight to the scaling incentive.

How you can be so confident? I can imagine there is some limit and with each scaling iteration gain you achieved will decrease so that further iterations would be more and more look pointless

I'm sure a limit will come around eventually. But plans are afoot to build city-sized data centers, and even then that's not enough to sate the AI superscalers' ambitions, hence Elon's talk about putting data centers in space. This is a level of compute scaling unheard of in our lifetime, and we're still a long, long way off from AGI. So while the juice may theoretically not be worth the squeeze at some point, with the current capacity we have there is no end within sight to the incentive to build more. It will take a number of years at least, and who knows how much environmental/economic destruction, before the dropoff in return on capex begins in earnest.

I made mobile friendly agentic driven IDE (as a PWA), where I can start "agent" processes on my different laptops (company, personal) or on the dedicated server and manage them from any browser / mobile device enywhere. Now I spent most of my time do programming in my head walking somewhere and talk to agents / review code directly from mobile. I also added support of n.eko like remote browsing streaming for emulating desktop browser while I'm on mobile and simplified deployment tool to manage kubernetes / docker deployments.

ios?

Sounds very self confident to claim such thing. Something like "If you don't do how me is doing, then you are doing it wrong"

Wondering is it only me who vibe coded PWA mobile IDE and remote agent hosted on the laptop, which uses claude -p and local code to allow coding via mobile?

There was no war zone at that time.

I doubt it can work. Noise cancelling in earphones works good only because it is very narrow ear channel and you are not dealing with any phase shifts due to changing position relative to noise source. Also there is no other things like reverberation and room acoustic which also contributes to phase of the signal that we actually recieve in our ear channel. In other words noise cancellation is possible only in one specific position of listener in the room.

Yup. I'm still learning- but it seems like a Helmholtz resonator would be best in this case.

Since a room has reflections and diffraction of the sound waves, the 312hz they're trying to dampen w/ ANC will be at different phases at different parts of the room. It's also not a point source.

I would propose funny solution to change the room where 312hz will fall into one of the standing wave frequency. Then if you combine properly where to place fan and where to place your sit, you can achieve effect of cancelling at this frequency/position (and amplifying in other positions)