Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | esafak's commentslogin

That's the advantage of LTS? 24.04 is the LTS, not the one you use, 22.04.

22.04 is also an LTS release, supported for another year still.

https://ubuntu.com/about/release-cycle

We're just now looking at moving production machines to 24.04.


If you are on a maintenance contract with Ubuntu, 22.04 is supported until 2032.

If it aint broken, don't fix it.


All even number .04 releases are LTS in Ubuntu

Try to pack as much clear work into your prompt as you can so you don't go back and forth.

Do hacks like “read prompt.md, and follow its instructions. When you’re done, read it again and follow its instructions.” And then you have some background process appending to the file to keep it warm and you just keep writing there?

There is a limit on how much copilot can do in one request, pretty generous but after some time vscode will say "this request is taking very long, do you want to continue" and that would count as a seperate request

> but after some time vscode will say "this request is taking very long, do you want to continue" and that would count as a seperate request

I don't think that's true. In VS Code, that's also configurable via the chat.agent.maxRequests setting.

There was absurd latency in the Copilot Opus 4.6 model on 1st and 2nd April which led to lots of my requests timing out with nothing to show though.


You could do that. I was just trying to say that if you make your original prompt complete enough, and you have well-defined success criteria, you can tell it to keep going until they are met.

Agreed - my experience mirrors this.

> "Fix the following compile errors" -> one shot try and stops.

> "Fix the following compile errors. When done, test your work and continue iterating until build passes without error" -> same cost but it gets the job done.


Like vast.ai and TensorDock, and presumably others.

They're just dumber. I've used plenty of models. The harness is not nearly as important.

The harness if anything matters more with those other models because of how much dumber they are... You can compensate for some of the stupidity (but by no means all) with harnesses that tries to compensate in ways that e.g. Claude Code does not because it isn't necessary to do so for Anthropics own models.

Tools gave humans the edge over other animals.

And those tools regularly burnt cities to ashes. Took a long time to get it under control.

*burn - I'm not sure we've gotten that under control quite yet


For creating an itinerary, for sure!

This is more about handling travel point hacking, credit card points and their transfer partners, comparing cash vs point prices, etc.

Plus, I like Atlas Obscura more than general internet searches for 'what to do' :)


I assume it was to make-up for the token overconsumption bug.


Please tell me you're a Microsoft customer.

you can declare tools and tasks with http://mise.jdx.dev/

im surprised this is so far down, this has changed so much of my setup. Ive swapped from pretty much all managers to this and its been a lifechanger

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: