If you use your VCS right the diff issue doesn't have to be a problem. Do the tidying up in the upstream branch, or at least as a separate commit that can precedes your actual logic changes.

Gödel committed suicide because the Brittish state persecuted him for being gay, which they recently issued an official apology for. To make a headline and article introduction that claims he commites suicide because of his genius is pretty tasteless.

That was Turing, not Gödel.

And they didn't apologise for Turing's death.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurt_G%C3%B6del#Later_years_an...

> In later life, Gödel suffered periods of mental instability and illness. He had an obsessive fear of being poisoned; he would eat only food that his wife, Adele, prepared for him. Late in 1977, Adele was hospitalized for six months and could no longer prepare Gödel's food. In her absence, he refused to eat, eventually starving to death.[19] He weighed 65 pounds (approximately 30 kg) when he died. His death certificate reported that he died of "malnutrition and inanition caused by personality disturbance" in Princeton Hospital on January 14, 1978.[20] Adele's death followed in 1981.

Here in Sweden it's usually three months for any long time employment. One month for short term.

Reading about zero or two weeks notice here makes me thinking what that does for the job market. On the one hand it surely makes for more movement, on the other hand it must make for a more ruthless job market. One of the upsides that I perceive with the three months notice is that it makes you think long and well about quitting, and encourages you to work things out. You don't just rage quit, because you'll have some three uncomfortable months.

If however, things really don't work out and both parts acknowledges this, you often come to an agreement of parting earlier.

Try reading it again, this time without reducing a persons life into a bullet-point list of what he did and didn't do. As other replies are pointing out — it's the whole situation from day one that creates a situation like that if Chris'. If you think you can solve that by saying its because of laziness, you really ought to read up on how people have been made to change throughout history: by being given a fair chance to succeed. How many times have you risen from the ashes, yourself?

You're so incredibly wrong here. From my life experience, you can be one of the following: 1. a smart guy who has slept with less than 5 girls and never had a non-sexual friend who's a girl, or 2. An ignorant, average intelligent guy who's slept with a lot of girls but as in 1, never been friends with a girl. I see upon writing this that the common denominator in these is the lack if a girl _friend_. Because if you had one, who would talk open heartedly with you, and without the boy/girl politeness mask on, you'd see that they share a lot more than you think. They occasionally fantasize about a stranger who can give them a quick and dirty lay as well. Although not if said stranger had no idea what is happening and is gonna tell his buddies the next day about the slut he fucked over. But rather that he met this awesome person who had an great sense of humor, taste in movies, and knew how to give awesome blow jobs. That's the kind of girls that our world, being more and more rid of caveman sexism, is fostering. I excuse myself in advance fornthe possibility that I'm putting too many words in other peoples mouths, but your attitude just makes me depressed and angry.

As I clicked comments on this article I felt anxious of whether I'd see some stupid derogatory comment — and there it is. The female sex organs weren't fully explored until 2009, but full acceptance of the exploration of the female body on HN is yet to come. So congratulations, you just made HackerNews feel as progressive as the locker room at the warehouse I worked at in my teens.

Whatever. The article says that they had medically imaged them in an aroused state as early as the late 90s, which contradicts the claim of the headline. That's all - and I explained that in my post.

I have no objection to exploration of the female body and was sufficiently interested in the subject beforehand to find the claim that this part of it 'was an absolute mystery until 2009' to be nonsensical.

"In fact, according to Ms. M, it wasn't until 2009 that researchers Odile Buisson and Pierre Foldés produced the first complete three-dimensional sonography of the stimulated clitoris, similar to the one shown here, depicted in profile."

Sensationalist wording is the hall mark of most journalism and isn't all that bad — it makes people read your stuff, and is used by a _lot_ of blog posts making their way to HN.(Hours are bullshit, Disrupting X, Why I hate Technology Y, etc.)

> Docker is not for doing fancy things with the running final products in their target format. Docker, by itself, is not for production at all! Once you've deployed a Docker container as a Xen snapshot or an AMI or whatever, it's done; some other infrastructure takes care of the running the target-format containers part.

This is something very interesting and under-communicated. I've always assumed docker is run on the production server and is used to pull updated images and spawn containers. But you're suggesting one uses custom toolchain for making an image out of the container filesystem and the LXC template, and then deploy this container?

Both are possible. And since docker itself is not yet production-ready, exporting docker containers to "inert" server images (for example AMIs) is a good stopgap which allows you to use docker for dev and test.

But that is not the ideal workflow. The ideal workflow is to run docker on all your machines, from development to production, and move containers across them. If you don't do that, you will miss out on a big part of the value of docker. To name a few: identical images in dev and prod; lightweight deployment; and a toolchain that is less dependent on a particular infrastructure.