Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | dlt713705's commentslogin

> 2. ... and when that inevitably fails, you... use a programming language?

Maybe it fails because you are trying to solve a problem with a configuration when it should be solved by a function implemented in the program you are trying to use.


And what do you suggest users do if that function isn't in the program and is unlikely to appear there?

Per latest available data, point of origin traces back approximately 13.8 billion years to a singular event designated "Big Bang". YMMV


> In the beginning, the Universe was created. This had made many people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.


As impressive as this setup may be, I'm still amazed at how slow this type of robot is, whether amateur or professional grade. I have no expertise in this field, but as an observer, the apparent progress in this area seems very limited. I guess my expectations are too high and my understanding of the problems to solve is too low.


It’s partially my fault I currently clip the max speed _and_ I only input soft control changes when teleoperating to avoid crashing into things. The robot itself could definitely move more quickly than what you see in the video.

It would be interesting to explore how RL can be applied on top of my (flawed) human demos to optimize beyond what I’m able to do.


Can't the board of directors be replaced by a board of AI ?


Yes, if you don’t believe the board ever exercises effective restraint or holds effective responsibility.

Which I understand people believe, but at least consider the possibility of the CEO being fired (and staying fired) by the board.


Sure, but that's not really the point as long as we exist in a world where the ultimate responsibility rests on humans. The alternative is skynet


Does anyone these days really use swap for anything than S4 suspend ?


https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40697318

This HN comment and the linked post brought up a lot of good points. The main takeaway is that swap should primarily be considered a mechanism for equality of reclamation, not for emergency extra memory, where equality of reclamation means file-backed pages and anonymous pages are subject to similar criteria for being evicted from physical memory.

I used to have zero swap on my Linux desktop and this convinced me to add at least a small swap partition.


My point is not to say that swap should not be configured on a Linux system. On bare-metal machines, I personally always set a swap partition equal in size to the amount of RAM because I usually want to be able to put the machine into S4 (suspend to disk).

I don't consider swap to be emergency RAM storage. I know that the kernel will decide by itself to use swap even if it has plenty of available RAM and the swappiness threshold is not reached.

Nevertheless, my two decent laptops (one with 16 GB RAM, the other with 64 GB RAM) never swap, even with Docker Swarm and multiple stacks, multiple VMs, desktop activities, and gaming.

It's been a while since I last saw a physical machine actively swapping.

I understand that some limited hardware may need swap, but I can't see such hardware having a GPU with plenty of VRAM.

That said, hacking things is always fun :)


I just set swappiness to zero years ago and never looked back.


That’s like the complete opposite advice. Chris said the lowest recommended swappiness is 1. I have it set to 100.


Agreed, but it means I still don't run into an OOM condition abruptly since the swap is there. It turns out modern disks are pretty fast, so the system freezes for a bit as physical memory is exhausted. Then I usually stop some of what I am doing and it goes back to normal.


It's useful on lower RAM systems as the least frequently used memory can be moved to swap, freeing up more RAM for stuff that needs it. Even when using zram it works out pretty well on my laptop with 8GB of RAM, it'll often have 4GB+ in zram swap space compressed down to only 1GB or so of physical RAM usage.


It really depends on what you run and how much RAM you have to do it in. I run some machines into swap just by running a couple browsers and some containers in the background on a 16GB laptop. I've also run a single light browser and essentially nothing else on 4GB and been fine:)


I'm very surprised, I run a docker swarm with multiple docker stacks on my 16GB RAM laptop which is also my main machine. i have multiple browsers each with multiple tabs. I also run multiple VM (Qemu/KVM) and even by gaming on top of all of that, I can not make it swap.

Edit: Typo


>S4 suspend

Is not popular in general, so yes. But also no - I don't use swap ever, if I have to go over the RAM (32GB being low, with 64GB the norm), might as well consider the system dead.


For me opening huge datasets, e.g. many gigabytes worth of profiling data, combined with other stuff running on the system, can end up pushing things to swap.


How do you say "Click here" in Latin ?


Google Translate suggested "preme hic" which is plausible to me (I've spent a lot of time with Latin but haven't thought of this particular question before). It literally means "press here".


According to google, "preme hic". ("press here")


probably same as "press here"


Clickus Hereus


Bigus Clickus


How do you say "click here" in Latin ?


Docker Swarm sits between Compose and k8s and can be used on a single node if your needs are modest. I find Docker Swarm more reliable and easier to automate with a CI/CD pipeline than Compose, and it also provides health checks and other useful directives allowing you to minimize downtime, rollback when a deploy fails, and so on.


It comes from the ancient Greek mythos, which means "speech" or "narrative", but can also refer to fiction. The word mythology (mythologie in French) derives from the same root.


But a robot war is an endless war. There will always be more robots to fight until the economy is completely exhausted.


Not necessarily. If the factories that build the robots are taken out, for example. Someone (even a robot) still has to build them.


What if the factories are located in foreign countries and the belligerents are only buying off-the-shelf products ?

Wars are always bad news and robot wars are very bad news. Many countries will fall into an endless war economy.


It turned out to be pretty hard to take out Germany’s factories in ww2.


Of course it did. War is hard, and lots of people die in it. The parent comment said always. I am saying that always is not true. I made no suggestions it was easy.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: