4 day delay kinda kills the point of the map no?

Same problem as before the LLM era tho.

This is one more argument to the only LLM trained to find "truth"

What consequence would he suffer if he attack nuclearly vs everything it's done so far ?

the marginal cost for him is unfortunately not that high at this point

still doesn't mean all tokens are useful. it's the point of benchmarks

Wow ! Only 2 years !

This is not a widely shared opinion.

Is that definitely not a widely shared opinion?

I feel like I can think of lots of situations where society puts in to protect children rather than leaving it to the parents (age ratings on films and games, YouTube Kids, regulations around advertising to children, the whole concept of school, reduced speed limits around playgrounds to give a few examples off the cuff).

It's fine as long as the state aligns with you and is generally sane.

History shows its not necessary always the case.

My point more was that you said it wasn't a widely shared opinion, but to my mind, it is broadly the status quo. Whether that is good or bad is a separate point.

"it take a village ...."

depends on your culture.

Since when was DJ David Guetta a reactionary?

(Yes, I read your comment history. I was tryinna figure out if you were in fact that guy and saw a bunch of conspiracy-ass right wing misinformation.)

Im not the guy obviously.

Its not reactionary to say you dont want the state to interfere too much in your child éducation.

Whether you are left or right its fine as long as the state aligns with you. But if you open an history book, you will sée it VERY OFTEN happened that states get crazy / ideological or just plain eugénist / liberticide.

Its dangerous to give too much power to the state

After freedom of speech, its nazi / fascist no to be concerned by age vérification ? What a world we live in

> I long thought their strong Gaullist stance on sovereignty was a bit silly in today's world, but turns out they were right along.

Silly ? it originally comes from the american trying to impose a governement to france / print money and administrate it right after WW2. The ONLY reasons this didn't happen is because De Gaulle marched to paris and became the de facto ruler of the nation after that from his popularity, other wise the american plan would have happened.

US has literally had the SAME policy since maybe as early as the 1800 : expand the empire and get as much as influence as possible. They were never exactly friends or at least "kind" friends.

If anything the subsequent presidents who meshed our defense / intelligence / technical appartus so deeply with the US were complete fools, at best.

I'm not sure you understood my point. I used to think it was silly, but now I agree with your view.

I've been on HN for 15 years and most of the times 80% of the content is not interesting to me, but i come for the 20%