Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | codezero's commentslogin

Well, no, not now they won’t.


How fast can you speed run KSP RP/RO?


The next Xbox already dropped physical media. The rog x ally Xbox portable is the last xbox branded gaming device.


Have a look at your local branch here: https://globalshieldnetwork.com/programs-2/


I enjoyed this video primarily because it never occurred to me that commercial airlines would have their jets repossessed. Obviously it's a different logistical operation, but still fascinating to see how it goes down.


Does anyone have any details on this claim?

  Important: Even after the modem is removed, if you connect your phone to the car via Bluetooth then the car will use your phone as an internet connection and send all the same telemetry data back to Toyota. However, if you use a wired USB connection then it does not do that (see the discussion here and elsewhere), so I exclusively use CarPlay via USB. I wish I had a way to completely disable the car’s Bluetooth functionality, but it’s deeply integrated into the head unit.
How can data via Bluetooth be routed to an active internet connection? I assume this would only work if you have the manufacturer's car application installed on your phone.

Following the thread linked to, the only thing I can find is very unsubstantiated; https://www.rav4world.com/threads/2019-rav4-dcm-deactivate-p... :

  One caveat, if you use bluetooth to connect your phone to the car DCM will use your phone to connect to the mother ship and presumably send your data. I only use my iPhone cable to connect to the car which does not have this effect.
This sounds like pure speculation, and I would love to hear if there is any information that can substantiate what they are claiming.


Yeah, I'm a little suspicious about that claim.

Bluetooth tethering is a thing, actually predates wifi tethering. Though it's not enabled unless you enable Personal Hotspot in your phone settings (and Android requires it to be enabled separately).

CarPlay complicates things, as it only uses bluetooth to pair, then it switches to using a wifi network (as bluetooth doesn't have anywhere near enough bandwidth). Maybe Apple automatically shares internet over that carplay connection?

I have no doubt that the car will use the internet connection if one is exposed, I just doubt it will be exposed automatically.


My iPhone automatically shares the internet without enabling hotspot with my Toyota via Bluetooth. It happens automatically. I just start the car, and it happens. And CarPlay is not involved, since there is no such thing in my car.


What are you looking at to know that's happening? Is the Toyota downloading/displaying some information only available on your phone, or from the Internet, or something else? Could it have a 4G connection of its own? What's the connection that makes you think the phone connection is letting it upload data over the Internet using your phone?


The car states that it connected to my phone and gets internet through it. There is a specific indicator for it. I have no clue what it downloads/uploads because I use it solely as a very expensive Bluetooth speaker.


Seems very worrysome and worth investigation. Basically, buttons in your phone are just an illusion.


One thing I notice is that it doesn't appear to upload contacts from your phone in usb mode. I haven't confirmed this.


My old Toyota (Touch and Go rev 1) had some online functionalities. It relied on Bluetooth tethering. Worked with an iPhone. At least sometimes.

So it's plausible the new Toyotas still have this functionality.

Hotspot/Tethering had to be enabled on the Phone, just a simple Bluetooth connection for calls or playing music didn't enable internet connectivity.


Bluetooth tethering is a thing, and I believe is enabled by default on Android, maybe it's using that?

For me on Android 16, the setting is in Network & internet > Hotspot & tethering > Bluetooth tethering


I mean, we did decades of JavaScript, so... I mean... anything is possible, right? :)


To keep it alive


thanks, I missed this yesterday.


Those shoes are gonna sell like crazy now but it would be hilarious if they were to be found to have been giving an unfair advantage because of some mechanical property of the shoe.


Reviews say that they have very very good, but not record breaking energy return and shock absorption. But what they are is insanely light at sub 100g.

https://runrepeat.com/adidas-adizero-adios-pro-evo-3


For a while it was all about getting the lightest shoes, because picking up heavy shoes slowed you down. Then the energy return (pebax foam, carbon plates/rods) became the main focus because the weight didn't matter as much when the shoe was literally springy. Surely this is now going to spark a race for the optimal balance between weight and energy return.


I can absolutely imagine that the "correct" balance varies from one person to another, and yet that this is both measurable and also irrelevant for non-pro athletes.

Like the number one endurance runner in the world will get a minute off their marathon time because a shoe manufacturer spent $1M making custom shoes for that athlete which don't even have a size they're just "For this one specific person, now" but then some guy on Reddit wants better shoes because he's sure his four hour marathon would have been "more like three" if he had those elite shoes instead of the $100 Nikes he wore...


The Nike Zoom Vaporfly's already had set this precedent years ago: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/07/18/upshot/nike-v...

The big improvement then was a carbon plate. Adidas (and others) followed suit. The subsequent improvements since then have been marginal but the margins are thin at that level. In this case the big advancement has been the weight of the shoe.

EDIT: Also it's worth noting these shoes are $500 retail. Adidas will for sure get a boost in sales from this, but there's definitely competition in the $200~$300 marathon running shoe space that won't solely draw everyone to Adidas)


Do these new Adidas shoes have anything major over the Vaporfly shoes? Maybe they are a bit lighter?

I think the big story here may be the nutrition science to get these guys to absorb a lot of carbs during the run, more than the shoes.


Well if they’re sold in stores and next year everyone will have a pair, then it’s not going to be an unfair advantage, is it?


There is a whole class of running shoes banned from various competitions.

Essentially the argument given was too much advantage came from the shoes and they didn't want racing to be about shoe technology development.


what else could it possibly be if not that?


Well, the marathon record has been broken 53 times since the early 1900s. So, there are a lot of factors at play. Better training, better nutrition, better tactics, and, yes, better shoes.

The advancements in shoes have made a measurable impact, but there are lots of optimizations being worked on.


Also population and access. In the time since the early 1900s a lot more humans exist, and more of them have the opportunity to attempt this record. Population in Africa exploded in that time and access improved significantly.

If you're bloody quick and born in Birmingham (either of them) in 1900 you can probably find out about and get yourself a chance to attempt that world record, but if you're born in Kapsabet (in Kenya) in 1900 good luck, even in Nairobi I wouldn't bet on it.


There’s info in one of the other threads about better carb intake too.

But yeah at this point, “it’s the shoes, stupid” should defo be the main part of the conversation.


[flagged]


If I wanted to know what an LLM thought (I don't) I would go ask an LLM.


One person sharing what an LLM thinks is probably better for the environment than each person asking...


I'll trade a little bit of damage to the environment in exchange for keeping meaningful communication between human beings alive and well.


AI told us we should add glue to pizza


In this economy, it may be sage advice.


Is that not what tomato paste and/or cheese is? Food glue? The other ingredients would fall off too easily otherwise.

Or did the AI say we should be using PVA/cyanoacrylate/polyurethane glue or something?


Specifically, Elmer's Glue.


I'm pretty sure that's an old trick based on some of the so-called cheese I've had on pizza


You should stop using 3.5


[flagged]


Is what the AI told him incorrect?


It sure would be great if the LLM in question would cite its sources so that we could verify whatever source it ingested this text from.


They always do. You’re either being intentionally daft or you haven’t used an LLM from within the last year and a half.


Indeed, I've seen LLMs begin to cite their sources, which is a commendable advancement and something that I've been asking for since the beginning of this craze: LLMs as librarians, not as summarizers. But if the commenter had a reputable data source, they should have quoted it and linked it.


I don't know, I didn't ask my AI


This is not the point


What is?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: