For me, it allows me to ship more projects in parallel, but not any given project faster, which is how I take your parent’s comment.

I could see that being the case in a company where you’re waiting on stakeholders and other people, but the parent commenter was talking about their personal side projects.

You don’t have to agree that it’s off-putting, but if you’re “struggling to understand why” that demonstrates a serious lack of empathy and awareness of social dynamics.

Yes, that’s the point.

A few screen shots of the sprites in the game would be helpful. Did I miss any links in OP?

Great suggestion, I'll add an example!

Still needs screenshots and video!

I would use this for most reality TV shows.

You'd be better off simply not watching those shows.

That’s not how awards work. Awards trade on prestige. In order for an award to matter, the people you’re giving it to have to care.

I think you’ll find most of the small teams making popular indie video games aren’t going to be interested in winning a pro-AI award.

> In order for an award to matter, the people you’re giving it to have to care.

Are you sure? Maybe not in gaming, but I'm sure most large companies create awards just to get them and mention them in marketing.

I wouldn't be surprised if the likes of EA and Ubisoft create a "best use of AI in gaming" award for next year.

I don't think pro-AI was discussed. It was rather not being anti-AI.

Is this not libel?

They don't actually allege anything. They add in the keywords without going so far as to say "this website is doing X." It's enough to trip the keyword filters at Cloudflare and other hosting providers and reverse the burden of proof.

Problem is they have way more money to fight and that’s basically their whole playbook. I was caught up in a fraudulent libel claim that had to settle* back in the Twitter days. When those companies want to come after you, it’s really hard to fight back.

* no money was exchanged just some guarantees to not disclose their client and remove tweets.

Helvetica is not usually in the running for use by lawyers.

As a body copy font, sans serif is generally seen as "friendlier" and more casual--which is one reason you see more of it than you used to in marketing copy and many other uses. Friendly and casual are generally not things I'm looking for in legal documents.

But isn’t that true of the ACLU as well?