Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | bluejellybean's commentslogin

Beats it for sure, humans are by far the most complex machines, a true marvel of the world. By comparisons, humans make phones look like simple toys.


I don't know, it's different. Humans are analog wonders, phones are digital wonders, both impressive in one of those categories.


Humans have a bunch of digital components at their core: DNA, RNA, and peptides. It's not all analog.

Likewise, phones have numerous analog components: microphone, speaker, camera, screen, radio modem, power regulation.

Please don't equate the word "digital" to the notions of being electronic, man-made, or modern. Digital is simply an agreement between a sender and receiver that information is finite and perfectly copyable. (By contrast, analog information is infinite and cannot be copied perfectly.)


This feels like the weirdest complaint to me. Just tell it to shorten its response.

Literally saying "one sentence response" solves most of this problem.


I'm in a similar camp, I dislike how often third-party package updates get pushed out, especially given the lack of serious inspection.

The reality is that each update is its own potential security issue and with supply chain attacks being all too frequent, it's not a panacea.


> The reality is that each update is its own potential security issue

Even beyond security issues: each update is a new opportunity for breakage, not only from bugs in the third-party package, but also from unexpected dependencies on the third-party package's behavior.


And that’s exactly why semantic versioning provides only an illusion of stability. This is also why ecosystems that don’t pin their versions such as floating versions that are the default in JavaScript ecosystems are so much more vulnerable from a security and a regression standpoint.


Road to hell is paved with a lot of 'shoulds' reality is a very different place filled with piles of trash and half baked ideas.


Yep, the 'unit' is size in which one chooses to use. The exact same thing happens when trying to discuss micro services v monolith.

Really it all comes down to agreeing to what terms mean within the context of a conversation. Unit, functional, and end-to-end are all weasel words, unless defined concretely, and should raise an eyebrow when someone uses them.


I have a very small utility library that receives a few downloads every couple of weeks that I just spent a few hours upgrading today.

It solved a problem I had, but it's a very small problem that few people share and the efforts spent selling it would be a poor use of my time given how niche it is. The few extra minutes to hit npm publish is worth the couple hits of dopamine I receive whenever it's downloaded.

It's just nice to know I saved someone an hour or so of their life. No need to reinvent this wheel.


How does one know what they want until they see it or imagine it?

When you can't imagine, you're stuck with searching, searching that comes in many forms, such as scanning catalogs, walking aisles, or letting someone else do it altogether.

If you can imagine what you want and describe it with sufficient language, you can have someone else (or something) go and fetch it for you, but you're still stuck with the problem of not getting _exactly_ what you want, so again, you must parse the results... or get stuck with whatever is returned first.

Ad the end of the day, it's a question of how much you care about getting the thing you want vs getting something that is close enough, and the answer is in how much effort you, personally, want to spend.


Yet, here you are ;)


I've been sharpening my axe by working on a few different projects in the shape of of an online shop[0][1]. Products are a bit of a mishmash as a result of the different projects - To date, I've been farming succulents, 3d modeling/printing (flower pots/hobby crafts/etc), and learning Rust/Next.js for the back/front ends!

Time investment has been _massive_ so far, but I just hit the first $100+ profit month, and despite the distance from my normal dev salary, the positive reviews/feedback have been an incredible reward that drives the motivation to continue. I will also say that it is quite the humbling experience to ship physical products and the experience has given me a whole new appreciation for the things we have in this world.

Early days, but check it out :)

[0] - https://freedomfrenchie.com [1] - https://www.etsy.com/shop/FreedomFrenchie


> Medium used to have an aura of carrying more reputational weight than a personal blog did.

At least within the realm of technical discussion, I'll be continuing to view it as a mostly negative signal. The institution is very rarely the individual, and there isn't value in assigning positive weight when said institution doesn't carry any itself.

Increased friction is counter-intuitively a positive here, it shows that the author has at least put some real investment into the presentation of their work. Don't get me wrong, doesn't need to be a fully self-designed/built website, just spending some cash on a domain && Wix template is at least _something_ more than throwing words at a page to profit.


I've been going back and forth for a blog/website relaunch. My current thinking is I'll just go with a new template on Google Blogger. I've actually been happy enough with that over the years.

I don't cross-post to Medium any longer.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: