Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | VarunAgw's commentslogin

I don't know why are you getting angry over them. They are not government. Also this point perfectly apply for people from EU.


If I remember correctly, it has been reported several times in the past and Chrome doesn't care about it at all.


I earlier tried running screen on top of mosh. But it did't worked for me. Can you tell how you exactly did it?


You run screen on the server side. mosh in, then screen. Works just fine.


And then you can use "Ctrl-A [" and arrows to scroll. Screen keeps a scroll buffer server side.


Every once in a while, I get difference error in /etc/issue*. I really hate all of these. I use Mint only because I like its GUI interface. I really cannot stand Ubuntu desktop for a moment


If Mint is just really a GUI interface, do they really need to put out a whole new distribution? Why not focus on the GUI and let the distros do the distribution?


I also use Mint mostly because of its interface and i hate Ubuntu desktop too.

Given this, what are the best alternatives to Mint GUI that offer the same level of comfort?


Ubuntu Gnome - works VERY well - if you enable the "window list" plugin for shell, it works as well as cinnamon. You can also use some other distro like debian or fedora that also provides cinnamon.


> if you enable the "window list" plugin for shell

And add minimize/maximize buttons and applications ("start") button. I have no idea why Gnome has to experiment, they have lost so many users unnecessarily. At least it's configurable to something sane. They are far from catering to the same feature-averse audience of iPad so there's no use in trying to (poorly) emulate its minimalist design language.


That's why Linux Mint wins. It look completely like MS Windows. Taskbar, Icons, Keyboard Shortcuts,...everything is similar to MS Windows. As a Windows user, I find it most easier to use and that's why they are winning.


> It look completely like MS Windows.

I prefer taskbar from 7+ and in my experience only KDE can mimic it, albeit clunkily. From screenshot it seems Mint is closer to XP. I think GNOME can be beaten to look more familiar and I can tolerate it. At least it now respects Windows key convention and runs its search functionality.


There's a mate flavor of ubuntu out now, and it works wonderfully.


I wish this was true everywhere. I've tried this few times on the companies I was very excited about, but it never worked so far for me. Most of the time, they don't even care to reply. I don't like faking interest, so I just drop my applications into the black hole these days.


But I am neither getting freedom nor security with smart phones. My 2 year old smart phone have never received a security update. It has become a piece of crap just within 2 years.


I'm guessing you have an Android device? Yep those Android security is nasty. the conficts of interest between the OS manufacturer, the handset manufacturer and the carrier have caused a load of fragementation and lack of support.

My personal opinion is that, unfortunately, regulation is the only way to solve that issue, as the market does not appear to be addressing it well.


Yeah unfortunately! A 10 year old desktop Computer running Lubuntu can be far more secure than my phone


Can this problem be solved by installing a custom ROM, such as CyanogenMod? I've only used Nexus Android phones, so am curious how to stay updated if using a phone from an OEM.


Wait.. Android goal is to provide security to novice users by taking away their freedom. Now why they want me to rely on advance solutions to secure myself.

But wait I'm novice who can't decide what is best for himself :(


The iPhone receives plenty of security updates, and does so relatively quickly after the fix has been implemented.


Not only isn't this relivant it isn't even true or at least very misleading.

Apple patches the newests version of iOS. Sometimes older versions get a security update here or there, maybe. So you'd have to be running the latest version of you want security fixes. Which isn't always possible due to compatibility or performance/stability.

If your iPhone is 3 or more years old you can forget any support from Apple whatsoever.


I guess the reason is cost. There are times I want to reinstall on older operating system, and Apple seems to go out of their way to make it difficult? In some cases impossible.

Why not please your customers? Give them what they want? I don't even think the average customer would need a TOS of all the negatives using an older operating system brings.

They have a huge war chest. If a customer wants to be on the operating system that came on their device ten years ago; why make it difficult?

Could it be they want us to upgrade/buy regularly? For myself, I don't think I will ever buy another new Apple product. I will still give them as gifts though.


the 4S from 2011 runs the latest iOS


The iPhone 4s wasnt discontinued until September 9, 2014. The 4s is the first iPhone to last 4 generations but 4s users have complained (and even filed a lawsuit) about the performance of iOS9 on the 4s.


Same here. I can't understand how people get guts to kill someone. Weren't their hand shaking when thinking of killing someone intentionally


Please tell me this is not true. How someone can so ruthless? I just can't believe this


Co-incidentally I got this in E-Mail as newsletter

https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/7-security-...


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: