Question is flawed; thought occurs in the mind: the moment you share that thought you are portentously sharing ramblings of your mond you havent really thought through fully…
(TLDR: if you have a point; make it- thinking out loud sometimes is useful, but rarely in the online forum, unless you’re in DMs or something…)
I had this as a kid. It was very difficult to enter text. The whole experience was underwhelming, unfortunately. Thank you to my parents who bought it for me. I’m a programmer to this day.
Yup. After 6 attempts it still couldn't understand me. And I'm a native english speaker, grew up in the US northeast, and nobody would accuse me of having any sort of non-US-broadcast-standard accent.
Having spent about 200$ on credits… yes, it glues together your words through transformers into images… of snippets of the identified corpus of images it has… with some specific prompt phrasings having cool weighting for making really nicely looking glued together results… it’s a model: classical computing - everything is turtles and duct tape and rivets and glue, all the way down…
Fixed relationship concepts are a deeply subjective model, too, and this isn't exactly taught in school.
Imagining that one knows "the" relationship between even two really obvious things can be the sign of a closed mind, or a mind which locks out new perspectives. This can be even more true, the more obvious the relationships may seem due to shared sensory biases.
IMO this is one reason why DALL-E 2 can be helpful for conceptualizing. If the user is open, DALL-E 2 can make mistakes and still teach you things through those same mistakes.
Unfortunately the relationship between DALL-E 2 and the user, so to speak, is also perceived as relatively fixed by members of the tech community, so highly do they rate their own ability to tell how "good" such a model is, etc.
Hey yeah! Imagine like two small guys in a garage could like make a indexer for the web and call it a search engine and just make it work the best, and gain market dominance and become a little bit slower to innovate than authors “back in 2006” nostalgia…
(TLDR: if you have a point; make it- thinking out loud sometimes is useful, but rarely in the online forum, unless you’re in DMs or something…)