Just because it's criminal, it doesn't mean that every private entity has to help to prevent it at costs of your privacy.
If there are people that host parties in their homes to share CSAM, does that mean that it should be mandatory to install surveillance cameras in your house?
Also as if people that are seriously sharing CSAM, wouldn't encrypt the data before sharing it.
Btw, at first sight it's unclear what the scope of this is.
It seems to be one project, but then it's actually multiple smaller libraries and "Latte" is just the organisation?
Also is the dependency management not it's own project?
It's an ecosystem that includes a number of tools, libraries, etc. The organization (include the GitHub org) is called Latte. Each project is a GH repository under that.
The dependency management system is part of the `cli` tool. And the repository management is the `app` project and published to https://app.lattejava.org.
The `cli` tool is the foundation though. It's how projects start, build, run, release, and publish.
The issue is mainly the nozzle. Ironically 3D printers are a lot easier there, since you just need to melt a thick wire, and not worry about microscopically small droplets.
OneDrive turns itself on after an update so what you think is local data can easily become cloud data. Then while you're not paying attention to a long running system they quietly delete it. Then folks like you come out of the woodwork to defend them. It's hilarious.
You are the example I was pointing out. At no point did I say anything about a company account. This happens on all windows machines. You can for example login to a machine acting as a server simply to use the Microsoft store to install something only to have it start syncing your files to that machine or even intermingle them and then force you to go through a tedious clean up process.
I have seen grandparents accidently lose all their files because they didn't know their files were being synced and then when they removed the Microsoft account from their machine suddenly their files are missing. Situations where they were told by support to logout / login only to lose all their data. These people take weeks or months to finally get someone's attention about the problem irl and these are precisely the types of people who will now be losing data because of the cavalier attitude from the so called experts.
But it's not the subject of this article. Making this particular change sound like a problem, when it isn't (as far as I can tell), only makes it harder to understand where there are genuine issues.
I've seen all sorts of situations. The problem is that after updates OneDrive tends to turn itself on or enable syncing when it was previously disabled without telling you. Or you use a Microsoft account to install something through their store and bam suddenly the local drive is intermingled with yours. It's a mess precisely because it's built in.
It was good for finding answers. But as a community to actually participate it was horrible. You couldn't even answer questions, because if you didn't get enough likes they would block you from answering any more.
I was unable to post answers to the questions within my domain of knowledge, because I didn't post answers (and get likes) outside of my domain of knowledge.
There's a minimum threshold of likes ("reputation") necessary to post in many parts of that service.
No. No there's not. If you get lots of downvotes on answers you might get banned from answering further questions until you improve your reputation score, but there's nothing like what you describe.
