Creative and alternative ways of realizing empathy for emotional-intelligence state security issues are at will of our ability to trust network.

That is more an issue of unflagging https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Trust_network than worrying about who is the alpha agent. We can count fine against secret traumatic wars if we each log action, community action (with secure, stable, distributed tools like http://www.matrix.org/alpha and https://www.getaether.net), and begin to self-determine our social systems and safety issues.

Maybe that need is why change (log) currency is so important. With headligns we say yes or no rules, there is forced error between terms.

Where really terming needs worthy space (safe) to audit psychotechnological/narrative trails, we fight judging betters as-if technology today has limited memory.

A. https://archive.today/memdu (see History, judge yourself)

Confusing pattern recognition is a fast pain. Slowing social scaling sense to account for trauma/error combinators is about literacy.

Shared/public/open source warning lists are distributed intelligence, letting end-users pick their own feed.

Pain-axis is enormously difficult/distressing to codify.

Stopping still has barely survived as logic and fact worth recording — as actionable emotional-intelligence.

Have you talked with Aether (http://www.getaether.net) / Burak Nehbit, about decentralization, proof-of-work, and end-to-end encryption?

Matrix's social tools might parallel well together.

Interesting - this is new to me (and ironic, given Aether was a candidate name for Matrix!). The projects seem very similar in some ways - both python/twisted/sqlite server stacks + angular frontend. The big differences seem to be that Aether is using AMP as its federation protocol rather than Matrix's HTTP/JSON federated DAGs, and is focused initially on forums rather than IM/VoIP. It's a bit strange that it advertises itself as entirely peer-to-peer though, when seemingly it is very much a client-server model (with server/server federation) just like Matrix, SMTP or XMPP. It's also slightly strange that the github repo is only showing certain drops from a private repo - I wonder why the dev isn't happening in the open. It's also hard to see what the actual decentralisation algorithm is, beyond replication. It doesn't seem to be using DAGs for eventual consistency or signing forum history.

In terms of anti-spam proof-of-work stuff, identity, sybil attacks and all the good stuff mentioned at http://blog.getaether.net/post/101566226287/a-few-updates-ab... it sounds like Aether & Matrix are at a fairly similar point. It would be super-cool to chat to Burak and get the two federated together (after all, Matrix is all about being glue between other communication media) - will ping him :)

Link missing because still waiting to start?

A distinguishing use case for open source intelligence is being able to counter lossy consciousness factors with open source counterintelligence.

Readily able to read and write due diligence are literate, educated, emotionally-intelligent populations who can be a part of (the granular war to determine) distinguishing records.