Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | BloondAndDoom's commentslogin

This is what I used to do and then life gotten complicated.

ADHD fish memory doesn't help either.


Unfortunately it became so common we don’t even care anymore, one of those things that normalized

I’m deleting my account as well, is there a way to export all chats to Claude or just Download to later load into a local LLM?

edit: Profile > Settings > Data Control > Export

Unfortunately Claude doesn't seem to have anyway to export these chats, no SDK, no native way of doing it, and I cannot think of a way other than hacky browser automation which might even trigger a ban.

If anyone figures this out please share.


You will probably never actually be able to create actual Claude chats from OpenAI chats, but you could ask Claude to read and distill your old OpenAI chats into Claude chat context. It won’t be the same, but it’s better than nothing, depending on what you’re hoping to get out of it.

The real story hear your doctor actually listened to you. I appreciate what a lot doctors do, but majority of them fucking irritating and don’t even listen your issues, I’m glad we have AI and less reliant on them.

It is not a doctor job to listen, smile or be nice. Their job is to fix you.

I mean - obviously if they're not listening their chance of the latter is pretty low.

Doctors hate to hear this, but if you're so poor in communication and social skills that the patient can't/won't follow you any care you've given, your value is lost.


Exactly my experience, I know they vibe code features and that’s fine but it looks like they don’t do proper testing which is surprising to me because all you need bunch of cheap interns to some decent enough testing

No there is a wide gap between good and bad testers. Great testers are worth their weight in gold and delight in ruining programmer's days all day long. IMO not a good place to skimp and a GREAT place to spend for talent.

So true. My first job was in QA. Involuntarily, because I applied for a dev role, but they only had an opening for QA. I took the job because of the shiny company name on my resume. Totally changed my perspective of quality and finding issues. Even though I liked the job, it has some negative vibes because you are always the guy bringing bad news / critizing others peoples work (more or less). Also some developers couldn't react professionally to me finding bugs in their code. One dev team lead called me "person non grata" when coming over to their desk. I took it with pride. Eventually I transitioned to develoment because I did not see any career path or me in QA (team lead positions were filled with people doing the job for 20+ years).

> Great testers are worth their weight in gold and delight in ruining programmer's days all day long.

Site note: all the great testers I've know when my employers had separate QA departments all ended up becoming programmers, either by studying on the side or through in-house mentorship. By all second hand accounts they've become great programmers too.


> they don’t do proper testing

They bring down production because the version string was changed incorrectly to add an extra date. That would have been picked up in even the most basic testing since the app couldn't even start.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46532075

The fix (not even a PR or commit message to explain) https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/commit/63eefe157ac...

No root cause analysis either https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/16682#issue...


Thats not true. Even for testing things, you need to do thoroughly now because standards are high.

From where I'm viewing, the standards in software have never been lower.

I don't think you need any qualifications to run the app and realize that it doesn't run.

This is the bar we're at now.


> all you need bunch of cheap interns to some decent enough testing

Sounds like a problem AI can easily solve!


Isn’t something like Keyring library better ? Not that any of this would protect against AI if the agent is really after it.

I mean their whole existence is about token prediction, so they just want to do their things :)

I mean if you are not connecting it to the real things why even bother, just chatgpt or Claude online at that point.

We have enough assistants, the key idea with opeclaw is it can do stuff instead of talk with what you have. It’s terrible security but that’s the only way it makes sense. Otherwise it’s just a lot of hoops to combine cron jobs with a AI agent on the cloud that can do things an report back.

Not that I think anyone should do it, it’s a recipe for disaster


Yeah, it's like saying you can hire a con artist as your personal assistant as long as they work from a sealed box and just pass little reviewed paper slips back and forth through a slit. Why have one at that point? Very difficult to be 'assisted' without granting access.

And the full circle begins AI writes a lot of content and we ask another AI to summarize it. It’s like that project where the guy keeps uploading and downloading a video to YouTube until it’s just mess of pixelated frames. I feel like AI written content is similar.


I’m guessing because it’s not produced by artists or people who has an eye for art generally.

When it comes to the book, changes are 80% is written by AI. I mean lots of content produced just pure AI, I’m following some AI subreddits and majority of the posts very obviously generate with couple of prompts, they don’t even bother styling while copy pasting. I’m really struggling to read online content recently.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: