I'm using it in conjunction with PCI passthrough instead of dual boot.
I've been running Windows 10 for more than a year now and played all kinds of AAA titles successfully. The performance-loss seems minimal.
Recently I managed to get a second GPU and spin up another VM, so now me and my partner can play on the same machine, heaving each a keyboard, mouse and screen.
Do you have any hints on how to set up a similar system? Links, guides, gotchas, whatnot? I've seen someone mention this setup before (perhaps it was you?) and I'm sure I'm not the only one interested in running something similar.
I do the same, I used to run my VMs off of ZFS with spinning disks, but that was too slow at times, so my last upgrade has been giving the VMs their own SSDs and that has worked out great, I then backup the VMs to ZFS and snapshot them.
Still I think there's a difference in how deep the intrusion goes. I can just not use Google (except it's harder on stock Android phones), but I can definitely go without Facebook by just not using it.
Having my own Operating System to spy on me makes me a victim whatever I do. I can't really escape from that.
It's hard for me not to use Google's products because they're good, it's hard for me not to use Facebook's because they managed to lock me in using social pressure.
They're sorted by highest delta, which makes it look so significant in the first moment.
Also, though one of golangs target was to get close to c-like performance, they never intended to be the "performance-killer" since the focus is also strong simplicity and productiveness.
Another angle where Rust is doing well is in peak RAM usage. Its memory usage is generally (although certainly not universally!) much lower in these examples.
That's exactly what I thought looking at the screenshots and having to look it up from the source is pretty disappointing.
Libui is great work and since it seems to be the biggest part of this project, it should be mentioned.
What is honestly going on in this comment section? First guy is confused by a perfectly good caption saying that the facility cost $2 billion to build and was completed in 2006. And second guy said he somehow thought that meant that taking a tour costs $2 billion (which would be obviously expensive just for a tour). And you have somehow misinterpreted the comment about the tour to be saying that the facility is expensive.
Will it still be the case next? I'm not saying it is a good choice, but maybe they consider they will gain enough traction to surpass it in the results.
If that's the idea, that would make the choice of name directly malicious, rather than just an unfortunate oversight.
I don't see how it would make qarioz's original point any less valid at all.
