Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The term "professional" should be taken euphemistically here. You will likely have a much better time with someone highly experienced with hallucinogen usage rather than a scientist in lab conditions.


I would be concerned that a lot of people feel like they're a lot more capable of tripsitting someone with an anxiety disorder than they really are.


That may be true, but scientific and academic credentials do not qualify anyone any more than direct experience. Would you trust a spelunking guide that has 100 trips down a cave, or someone who got a PhD in spelunking without taking any actual trips?


Are those my only two choices? I might instead choose not to cave at all.


No, they aren't. I was responding to the implied meaning that you only have one choice, that being professionally trained medical/scientific experts.


On hacker news we are only allowed binary decision making no matter how analog the situation, but obviously the optimum solution is to talk to / work with both, although I'm guessing they aren't going to literally work with each other at the same moment. Which is really too bad. I could totally see a GP, Specialist, and Patient relationship developing.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: